IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Inip-discuss] Domain Names

Gihan Dias <gihan@cse.mrt.ac.lk> Sat, 19 December 2015 05:16 UTC

Return-Path: <gihan@cse.mrt.ac.lk>
X-Original-To: inip-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: inip-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455DF1A1F16 for <inip-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 21:16:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.886
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.886 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AJMVUWmuEAdx for <inip-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 21:16:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.mrt.ac.lk (smtp.mrt.ac.lk [192.248.8.101]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5561A1F04 for <inip-discuss@iab.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 21:16:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.mrt.ac.lk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C51624249D for <inip-discuss@iab.org>; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 10:46:43 +0530 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uom.lk
Received: from smtp.mrt.ac.lk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.mrt.ac.lk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h9ViPFuOpZpu for <inip-discuss@iab.org>; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 10:46:42 +0530 (IST)
Received-SPF: none (cse.mrt.ac.lk: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=smtp.mrt.ac.lk; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from="gihan@cse.mrt.ac.lk"; helo=submit.uom.lk; client-ip=192.248.8.107
Received: from submit.uom.lk (inrelay.mrt.ac.lk [192.248.8.107]) by smtp.mrt.ac.lk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94927242470 for <inip-discuss@iab.org>; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 10:46:41 +0530 (IST)
Received: from [10.218.70.56] (unknown [175.157.36.186]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gihan) by submit.uom.lk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C87865FD51 for <inip-discuss@iab.org>; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 10:46:41 +0530 (IST)
To: inip-discuss@iab.org
References: <D285CCDC.11B63%edward.lewis@icann.org> <CAHw9_i+tKjR87VADPzgm3xEWvQebqr_sigs9oEy3d5LKa4EcCQ@mail.gmail.com> <567429FE.5030503@cse.mrt.ac.lk> <CAHw9_iLGR_-z6K0GtYTcv+azoCink4rhcAjMiYZX_e1iPRyjPg@mail.gmail.com> <BCC44572-4377-4767-8364-08A7C1355CC5@gmail.com>
From: Gihan Dias <gihan@cse.mrt.ac.lk>
Organization: University of Moratuwa
Message-ID: <5674E83E.1070709@cse.mrt.ac.lk>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 10:46:46 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BCC44572-4377-4767-8364-08A7C1355CC5@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/inip-discuss/zVAT156Sbjugby47oQpaGx8JbwI>
Subject: Re: [Inip-discuss] Domain Names
X-BeenThere: inip-discuss@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IAB Internet Names and Identifiers Discussion List <inip-discuss.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/inip-discuss>, <mailto:inip-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/inip-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:inip-discuss@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:inip-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/inip-discuss>, <mailto:inip-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 05:16:50 -0000

On 15/12/19 2:35 AM, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
The IAB recently decided that all of the technical programs should have public, open-subscription lists, to make sure we’re getting the widest input possible on those topics if architectural interest and to support transparency in “what are the programs doing anyway?”
Warren, Ed, Suzanne,

Thanks.

I read the INIP description, and my take is that the mandate of INIP is to

1. Study the current use of names and identifiers on the Internet (including, but not limited to the DNS)
2a. Identify issues with current naming systems - in particular incompatibilities between various systems.
2b. Identify gaps (e.g. bidirectional aliasing, or better protection for privacy, or context information such as localization or administrative boundaries) in the existing naming systems.
3. Architect a set of naming systems for the Internet (assuming that a single naming system will not suffice).

and the purpose of this list is to discuss the issues in a broader audience than only the INIP members.

Do we have any other documents than the https://www.iab.org/activities/programs/names-and-identifiers-program/" rel="nofollow">INIP description and https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lewis-domain-names-01" rel="nofollow">Ed's Internet Draft ?

I will try to get my thoughts together and post something to the list.

Gihan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email