Re: [Inip-discuss] Domain Names

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Wed, 13 January 2016 22:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: inip-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: inip-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DEDE1A87BD for <inip-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:41:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F6P6qBymm9j7 for <inip-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:40:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (mx2.yitter.info [50.116.54.116]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59B31A8761 for <inip-discuss@iab.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:40:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37FD110869 for <inip-discuss@iab.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 22:40:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx2.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44Idm1MvAslz for <inip-discuss@iab.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 22:40:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (unknown [IPv6:2601:18d:8600:87d9:9da8:3a95:a2d4:34ac]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 519CA105E5 for <inip-discuss@iab.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 22:40:58 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:40:56 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: inip-discuss@iab.org
Message-ID: <20160113224056.GY34398@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <D285CCDC.11B63%edward.lewis@icann.org> <A3306B3F-2C01-4236-8A5F-119C1669425B@isoc.org> <D2A15E6C.124B4%edward.lewis@icann.org> <7047EC59-873A-4A76-80EF-3F2899A9052A@interisle.net> <CAHw9_iL1f7pgaFHdqWJTpW5mxbfRYsquOO3J-5cVNLv103LSig@mail.gmail.com> <5692C267.9050907@acm.org> <6B02F3E8-415B-4B50-A463-1226A7337CE1@interisle.net> <4FFFFEA1-62C6-4C75-B13A-6A8D03D333F7@gmail.com> <6E17EC3C-4EAC-4763-A828-26915B545F59@interisle.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6E17EC3C-4EAC-4763-A828-26915B545F59@interisle.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/inip-discuss/afv4EZ0_CMx9ch9rux-wdsiekBE>
Subject: Re: [Inip-discuss] Domain Names
X-BeenThere: inip-discuss@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IAB Internet Names and Identifiers Discussion List <inip-discuss.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/inip-discuss>, <mailto:inip-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/inip-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:inip-discuss@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:inip-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/inip-discuss>, <mailto:inip-discuss-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 22:41:01 -0000

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 01:04:03PM -0500, Lyman Chapin wrote:
 
> (among other things). It's useful to discuss the name space
> separately from the resolution protocols, but from an engineering
> standpoint the usefulness level is much higher if we also know how
> specific systems (like the DNS) use the name space

The recently-published terminology RFC attempts to point out this
latent distinction in just a couple places, FWIW.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com