RE: clarification of blanket statement text
Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Fri, 18 February 2005 17:50 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA12924 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:50:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D2Ccu-0003Sq-EX for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:13:17 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D2C1i-0008Ca-PO; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:34:50 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D2BZI-0003xk-6X for ipr-wg@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:05:28 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA07552 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:05:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D2Buy-0001kq-Ct for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:27:53 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A541A621FF; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:04:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10608-07; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:04:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.1.145] (162.80-203-220.nextgentel.com [80.203.220.162]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C577D621F6; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:04:51 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:04:51 +0100
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: rbarr@cisco.com, "'George T. Willingmyre'" <gtw@gtwassociates.com>, 'Scott W Brim' <sbrim@cisco.com>, ipr-wg@ietf.org
Message-ID: <C894CB81C38DE53489DC609F@gloppen.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <200502181632.j1IGWXYO019397@sj-core-4.cisco.com>
References: <200502181632.j1IGWXYO019397@sj-core-4.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: RE: clarification of blanket statement text
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
--On fredag, februar 18, 2005 08:32:33 -0800 Robert Barr <rbarr@cisco.com> wrote: >> Agreed - these companies will have to continue to make specific IPR >> statements. Making such statements is consistent with the >> RFC, and provides >> information to the IETF community - which I think is a Good >> Thing - but >> they do not lessen the requirement on the companies that make them. >> >> Harald > They should be marked non-compliant, as is done with other types of > statements. Why is it consistent w RFC?? The excerpt above says > "requirement not satisfied" As I interpret it, they satisfy the formal requirements for a disclosure, but do not satisfy the (more strict) requirement for a disclosure that allows the filer to not file any more disclosures. Scott and Jorge will probably chime in if I got that one wrong. _______________________________________________ Ipr-wg mailing list Ipr-wg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg
- clarification of blanket statement text Scott W Brim
- Re: clarification of blanket statement text todd glassey
- RE: clarification of blanket statement text Robert Barr
- Re: clarification of blanket statement text todd glassey
- RE: clarification of blanket statement text Lawrence Rosen
- Re: clarification of blanket statement text Scott W Brim
- RE: clarification of blanket statement text Lawrence Rosen
- RE: clarification of blanket statement text Robert Barr
- RE: clarification of blanket statement text Robert Barr
- RE: clarification of blanket statement text Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: clarification of blanket statement text Robert Barr
- RE: clarification of blanket statement text Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: clarification of blanket statement text Robert Barr
- RE: clarification of blanket statement text Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: clarification of blanket statement text Contreras, Jorge
- RE: clarification of blanket statement text Contreras, Jorge
- RE: clarification of blanket statement text Robert Barr
- RE: clarification of blanket statement text Robert Barr
- Re: clarification of blanket statement text Scott W Brim
- RE: clarification of blanket statement text Robert Barr
- RE: clarification of blanket statement text Robert Barr
- RE: clarification of blanket statement text Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- RE: clarification of blanket statement text Robert Barr
- Re: clarification of blanket statement text Scott W Brim
- RE: clarification of blanket statement text Lawrence Rosen
- UIRe: clarification of blanket statement text George T. Willingmyre
- Re: clarification of blanket statement text George Willingmyre