[IPsec] RFC5996bis editorial change in section 3.2 Generic Payload Header (Was One more editorial issue in RFC5996)

[Tero Kivinen <[e-mail]>]

Valery Smyslov writes:
> Just came across one more small editorial issue in RFC5996.
> Page 73, description of "Next Payload" field, sentence
> 
>       In the header of an Encrypted payload, the Next Payload field is set
>       to the payload type of the first contained payload (instead of 0);
>       conversely, the Next Payload field of the last contained payload
>       is set to zero).  
> 
> has extra round bracket at the end.

Removed.
-- 
[e-mail]