Re: [IPsec] RFC5996bis editorial change in section 1. Introduction (Was Re: Editorial changes to RFC5996)

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 12 November 2013 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0952721F9D0A for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:18:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BuK2pylGMvid for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:18:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bk0-x233.google.com (mail-bk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0756E11E8169 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:18:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-bk0-f51.google.com with SMTP id my12so2298685bkb.38 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:18:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2sQRTsTMJ04ddyYEuPySA9fj3gwF/E/IFCJJQBiRIZU=; b=xw8cO9oodSDE+roo8KtsJyjkycU3IWQI+GOFmpepnhRuhHPHxsQiDAVqL5BzAf0Is/ QhTnfFbxpUDoaBW3eNORASylgfz2qRYPez19rGofd4OqLxLpOvypFUSNeN3XUGloGZk5 Su7GPLuMmyppFFri2jcRn2klRGUyPX9OM4GpbhQqMfHxYq6lKiQ96/O98JnQQvt+NLAJ CLKiPP/u5GaaR+QAd97I2GYKiQfPiXsOG69j+q0MWJ2KiElm7btiJIapv06Ig3oTl9yz aQpayHmvZAcfPUsDwt0DQTLojrwxejmZ0FglWYbe6mv1i84vqnKt0Yk2E3YWkMuPq/Q6 03Nw==
X-Received: by 10.204.103.5 with SMTP id i5mr47694bko.176.1384269483175; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:18:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.201.198] (diup-241-234.inter.net.il. [213.8.241.234]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l9sm18639824bkg.0.2013.11.12.07.18.01 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:18:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <528246A8.8020009@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:18:00 +0200
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
References: <21087.60447.758422.672867@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <7C1EFED8998C4309B562F2224DD39AA2@buildpc> <526141A0.5030206@gmail.com> <21122.17811.829263.373978@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <21122.17811.829263.373978@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org, Valery Smyslov <svanru@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] RFC5996bis editorial change in section 1. Introduction (Was Re: Editorial changes to RFC5996)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:18:12 -0000

Looks good to me.

	Yaron

On 11/12/2013 05:13 PM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
> [I am now doing these editorial changes, and I will be sending
> separate emails for each of them, just so I can keep track of what is
> changed and where, and you can complain if I miss or misinterpret
> something (but do not complain about missing changes before I send
> email that I have processed all of the changes).]
>