Re: [IPsec] RFC5996bis editorial change in section 1. Introduction (Was Re: Editorial changes to RFC5996)

"Valery Smyslov" <svanru@gmail.com> Tue, 12 November 2013 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <svanru@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A3C21E812A for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:59:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T8VAvz4BVXhk for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:59:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-x229.google.com (mail-qa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C8F21E8143 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:58:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id k4so2951240qaq.14 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:58:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:importance; bh=FQj8MRifutPVBrnfMTwl5lc4zB9E/NqQAKV7nYmyJqQ=; b=TT6eaZ7wTEBkwK3Bt12pJfiTpC4k23Y/iVQ0mF2apdd+eyobcJJ35wuSaZcLV1rksm G2GNDZt2HEiXr81XuOz/R/diTihOdbSkt5zjffrdv6asLoqzEg7ev01DaGBvrIb+/Yfn UqacHMrr/HMSY9GmiQ+lax4ftoUNtXsJ3uHinHIjCbn61fWYfN0cnrhmLjy9UrfHePVV yLS9/5SHvEOqIe/LkJou9R9LU6FF11Lz2NpVoJWChVkfaMtXpKd/eOLhC1I6oZxhWrmY BMTj32/rq6E2H+Hdn0NlnzoHWERb8E79cfjSxIcTdncP91Sf9M1hj08QDwZfrIBqQ1kc hDwA==
X-Received: by 10.49.98.100 with SMTP id eh4mr57860636qeb.42.1384271934565; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:58:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from notebook (pool-71-125-201-224.nycmny.east.verizon.net. [71.125.201.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r5sm63174575qeh.1.2013.11.12.07.58.53 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:58:54 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <AE57D0DD1CDD483DB8A35093B1E48BF9@notebook>
From: Valery Smyslov <svanru@gmail.com>
To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
References: <21087.60447.758422.672867@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <7C1EFED8998C4309B562F2224DD39AA2@buildpc> <526141A0.5030206@gmail.com> <21122.17811.829263.373978@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <528246A8.8020009@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <528246A8.8020009@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:58:48 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="ISO-8859-1"; reply-type="response"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3508.205
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3508.205
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IPsec] RFC5996bis editorial change in section 1. Introduction (Was Re: Editorial changes to RFC5996)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:59:12 -0000

Agreed.

Valery.

-----Original Message----- 
From: Yaron Sheffer
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:18 AM
To: Tero Kivinen
Cc: Valery Smyslov ; ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: RFC5996bis editorial change in section 1. Introduction (Was Re: 
[IPsec] Editorial changes to RFC5996)

Looks good to me.

Yaron

On 11/12/2013 05:13 PM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
> [I am now doing these editorial changes, and I will be sending
> separate emails for each of them, just so I can keep track of what is
> changed and where, and you can complain if I miss or misinterpret
> something (but do not complain about missing changes before I send
> email that I have processed all of the changes).]
>