Re: [IPsec] I-D on Using the ECC Brainpool Curves for IKEv2 Key Exchange

"Dan Harkins" <dharkins@lounge.org> Fri, 30 November 2012 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <dharkins@lounge.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9534621F8659 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:57:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JnqIhvSeNEhZ for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:57:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from colo.trepanning.net (colo.trepanning.net [69.55.226.174]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58BF21F85D9 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:57:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www.trepanning.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colo.trepanning.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B81F1022400A; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:57:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 69.12.173.8 (SquirrelMail authenticated user dharkins@lounge.org) by www.trepanning.net with HTTP; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:57:25 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <074557eff2f722f10198aac4fb2f8d9c.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
In-Reply-To: <50B8A287.9090509@secunet.com>
References: <50B8A287.9090509@secunet.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:57:25 -0800
From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
To: Johannes Merkle <johannes.merkle@secunet.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.14 [SVN]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>, Manfred Lochter <manfred.lochter@bsi.bund.de>, "Turner, Sean P." <turners@ieca.com>, rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Re: [IPsec] I-D on Using the ECC Brainpool Curves for IKEv2 Key Exchange
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 17:57:26 -0000

  Hi Johannes,

On Fri, November 30, 2012 4:11 am, Johannes Merkle wrote:
> We have submitted a new revision of the Internet Draft on
> Using the ECC Brainpool Curves (defined in RFC 5639) for IKEv2 Key
> Exchange
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-merkle-ikev2-ke-brainpool/
>
> Since there was considerable objection to the point compression method in
> the WG, we have removed this option altogether
> and define only the uncompressed KE payload format, which is in full
> accordance with RFC 5903.
>
>
> Any feedback is welcome.

  I see that there is a requirement that an implementation MUST verify
that the D-H common value is not the point-at-infinity. Do you think
there should also be a requirement that an implementation MUST verify
that the x- and y-coordinates received from a peer satisfy the equation
of the negotiated curve (and abort the exchange if not)?

  regards,

  Dan.