Re: [IPsec] I-D on Using the ECC Brainpool Curves for IKEv2 Key Exchange

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 07 December 2012 12:48 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718CD21F8727 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 04:48:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bbkPH3ZaC9rm for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 04:48:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244FE21F86EB for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 04:48:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-bk0-f44.google.com with SMTP id w11so222196bku.31 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 04:48:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+W+vfD+2IYfr0cDWPfR1ZL1MzFYkSpGKDwE2tWueO/o=; b=0bIuNlMJ5LaXxbk7ZUekSjAEVA8iq6CYApRB4aghwylqNYUjLemeRTkcdMUr8uDaKo ILF55x2aCGcB4szwMkO4WUGNtEHRf5YhQ5B/5AJjIYRYRFVS0iiKdI3BfqHj1j7D6yB6 W/zkI+Nqrve6mcgyx1nKkI1+l37KixaimzH0hiLeNFksjSlQAVk4jLALE+7ENMVmjUI6 e90DUmhvw4cOEifs8+VvObImrTARAQ+OgRnANMM1hbMKxNOIEGaob34CceRghXde1qBA 3AssLf89oHgEeANeEnC/uy+ZsN/JpocJNLKr5H3Aqh+aqZOlYHWhbyGIMlP13Xa/L2HF 9l3Q==
Received: by 10.204.4.131 with SMTP id 3mr1825080bkr.25.1354884500093; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 04:48:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.3] (bzq-79-180-163-165.red.bezeqint.net. [79.180.163.165]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y11sm8957804bkw.8.2012.12.07.04.47.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 07 Dec 2012 04:48:18 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50C1E577.8060607@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:47:51 +0200
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Johannes Merkle <johannes.merkle@secunet.com>
References: <50B8A287.9090509@secunet.com> <074557eff2f722f10198aac4fb2f8d9c.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <4613980CFC78314ABFD7F85CC30277210EDCE571@IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com> <A113ACFD9DF8B04F96395BDEACB340421C9045@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <50B9DC95.80202@gmail.com> <A113ACFD9DF8B04F96395BDEACB340421CA383@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <50BA5A70.6030808@gmail.com> <50BC8460.9030808@secunet.com> <20668.40826.934312.605279@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <50C1CA50.3020703@secunet.com>
In-Reply-To: <50C1CA50.3020703@secunet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Manfred Lochter <manfred.lochter@bsi.bund.de>, Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>, Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>, IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>, "rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>, "Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)" <sfluhrer@cisco.com>, "Sean P. Turner" <turners@ieca.com>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] I-D on Using the ECC Brainpool Curves for IKEv2 Key Exchange
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:48:22 -0000

Hi Johannes,

Scott and I are working on this draft. You can expect an initial version 
within a week.

Thanks,
	Yaron

On 12/07/2012 12:52 PM, Johannes Merkle wrote:
> Hi Tero,
>
>>
>> I think it would be best to take the ECDH processing rules (mostly
>> from 5903 but also add the checks if those are needed) and create new
>> RFC that will update 5996. This document should not include any
>> groups.
>>
> I assume that my draft should refer to this RFC-to-be, right?
>
>
>