Re: [IPsec] New PAKE Criteria draft posted (def. of gateway)

"Kaz Kobara" <kobara_conf@m.aist.go.jp> Thu, 25 March 2010 23:40 UTC

Return-Path: <kobara_conf@m.aist.go.jp>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6473A69BF for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.04
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.04 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dI-FKYTL3Qez for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp (mx1.aist.go.jp [150.29.246.133]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE7B3A683B for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o2PNenXU003071 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:40:49 +0900 (JST) env-from (kobara_conf@m.aist.go.jp)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=m.aist.go.jp; s=aist; t=1269560449; bh=cKmq1V4e4sbLpfVoIX/bEpz27dm3fy+nZRaA5vH0SvY=; h=From:Date:Message-ID; b=nTdsNzvgAtQS2McDB0dNS/wsi8dKnZTytdP64JYbhrG3uzHmUOF+FyxO/tUJBZlIf u/QXbAOWG+GknWkWj1N+yTCAiTgpepC67rGXXEVZTQ8alCEjEGqbCK4kUDOpNksRd8 gx3zz0At7bd6vUmASTjYfuT6juN76+seiqGv9A8I=
Received: from smtp3.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o2PNemHp004445 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:40:48 +0900 (JST) env-from (kobara_conf@m.aist.go.jp)
Received: by smtp3.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o2PNelkC006258 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:40:48 +0900 (JST) env-from (kobara_conf@m.aist.go.jp)
From: Kaz Kobara <kobara_conf@m.aist.go.jp>
To: ipsec@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:40:51 +0900
Message-ID: <015701cacc74$9b0f3c20$d12db460$@aist.go.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcrMSajKfQlL1qC9RXauA2xWjjDOaQADzTAQAAbMQtA=
Content-Language: ja
Subject: Re: [IPsec] New PAKE Criteria draft posted (def. of gateway)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:40:28 -0000

Hi Yaron

> draft-sheffer-ipsecme-pake-criteria-02.txt says in Page 4
> "This document is limited to the use of password-based authentication to
> achieve trust between gateways"

I would like to make sure that
"gateway" in this document does not encompass VPN clients and hosts, right?

Kaz

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Yaron Sheffer
> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 3:31 AM
> To: SeongHan Shin
> Cc: IPsecme WG; Kazukuni Kobara
> Subject: Re: [IPsec] New PAKE Criteria draft posted
> 
> Hi Shin,
> 
> Yes. For the typical remote access VPN, EAP is typically more useful.
> Note that there is still need for strong password-based mutual
> authentication EAP methods - but their home is the EMU working group.
> 
> In addition, the IPsecME has another charter item designed to fit such
> EAP methods (such as the future EAP-AugPAKE :-) into IKEv2.
> 
> Please see again the group's charter,
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ipsecme/charters.
> 
> Thanks,
> 	Yaron
> 
> On 25.3.2010 20:07, SeongHan Shin wrote:
> > Dear Yaron Sheffer,
> >
> > I have one question about the draft.
> >
> > draft-sheffer-ipsecme-pake-criteria-02.txt says in Page 4
> > "This document is limited to the use of password-based authentication
> to
> > achieve trust between gateways"
> >
> > Is this a consensus of this WG?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Shin
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com
> > <mailto:yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi,
> >
> >     after the good discussion in Anaheim, and with the help of comments
> >     received on and off the list, I have updated the PAKE Criteria draft
> >     and posted it as
> >
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-sheffer-ipsecme-pake-criteria-02.txt.
> >
> >     I have added a number of criteria, clarified others, and added
> >     numbering (SEC1-SEC6, IPR1-IPR3 etc.).
> >
> >     Thanks,
> >         Yaron
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     IPsec mailing list
> >     IPsec@ietf.org <mailto:IPsec@ietf.org>
> >     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > SeongHan Shin
> > Research Center for Information Security (RCIS),
> > National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST),
> > Room no. 1003, Akihabara Daibiru 10F,
> > 1-18-13, Sotokannda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0021 Japan
> > Tel : +81-3-5298-2722
> > Fax : +81-3-5298-4522
> > E-mail : seonghan.shin@aist.go.jp <mailto:seonghan.shin@aist.go.jp>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec