Re: [IPsec] New PAKE Criteria draft posted (def. of gateway)

"Kaz Kobara" <kobara_conf@m.aist.go.jp> Sun, 28 March 2010 06:40 UTC

Return-Path: <kobara_conf@m.aist.go.jp>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA083A6A51 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 23:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.34
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.34 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.300, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jZZDvrOR3qDJ for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 23:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp (mx1.aist.go.jp [150.29.246.133]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF083A6A4F for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 23:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o2S6elBS017083 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:40:48 +0900 (JST) env-from (kobara_conf@m.aist.go.jp)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=m.aist.go.jp; s=aist; t=1269758448; bh=fmuC2ykf81FsGrRRu7BLS6m0SPRl4o8dtMlMQSUNg/w=; h=From:Date:Message-ID; b=kBypB3EWH4WEmVSqyC0SPV+iHBqUXMreeD4AsitbmvLru66oQIh1Up1O23MMY5FMy Tq23AaUy9dc7qyAP3hxFJw/B4IyqfjqWdZgVetCGpiKyTYCPnQEz9idSyewROmkKlD GMzmFLS6SYx8stktbf1P7zOOxjogDHoPpH3Zp4J8=
Received: from smtp1.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o2S6ell2026635 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:40:47 +0900 (JST) env-from (kobara_conf@m.aist.go.jp)
Received: by smtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id o2S6ekiE010166 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:40:46 +0900 (JST) env-from (kobara_conf@m.aist.go.jp)
From: "Kaz Kobara" <kobara_conf@m.aist.go.jp>
To: <ipsec@ietf.org>
References: <015701cacc74$9b0f3c20$d12db460$@aist.go.jp> <4BAC4283.9010002@gmail.com> <018001cacd04$d59efc50$80dcf4f0$@aist.go.jp> <4BAE10BC.7090401@gmail.com> <001001cacdd7$557f0190$007d04b0$@aist.go.jp> <3b12564381bb3d1b9eea9b3276a68487.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
In-Reply-To: <3b12564381bb3d1b9eea9b3276a68487.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:40:46 +0900
Message-ID: <001801cace41$98e87e10$cab97a30$@aist.go.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcrN7owbc1//mc3YQq+KpCrtA+hPoQAUCmGw
Content-Language: ja
Subject: Re: [IPsec] New PAKE Criteria draft posted (def. of gateway)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 06:40:25 -0000

>   So is there a reason you don't want to fix this "between clients
> and gateways"?

(As most of this WG members have already noticed)
PSK in IKE is foolish in the sense that it is vulnerable against off-line
dictionary attack while using heavy DH calculation.

There is no reason not to fix this foolish PSK (regardless of "between
gateways" and "between clients and gateways".)

Kaz