Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA)

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Mon, 11 May 2020 22:57 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1BD3A0D82 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2020 15:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cx_zm4jFj0aD for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2020 15:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC75F3A0D7F for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2020 15:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: 6man@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.local (089-101-070074.ntlworld.ie [89.101.70.74] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 04BMvKVl010253 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 May 2020 23:57:21 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 089-101-070074.ntlworld.ie [89.101.70.74] (may be forged) claimed to be crumpet.local
Subject: Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA)
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: 6man <6man@ietf.org>
References: <DM6PR05MB6348FA1FC00258ACE4FDE444AEA10@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CALx6S35EncqhfBCP0aZHqBQ2MBT1VSxpRUB59dOTBpP4wwFsjg@mail.gmail.com> <41a5a637-7b77-e9b8-180a-9a0d0958edfd@gmail.com> <CAOj+MMEu5SgQEFSSxNiZnthm=jMAMQE301PGycdteitqk2d27A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <751a0e85-a242-eb15-ed48-345b563cf982@foobar.org>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 23:57:19 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMEu5SgQEFSSxNiZnthm=jMAMQE301PGycdteitqk2d27A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/--RnX38CqQBj8Xovr4ZhmqkYRP8>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 22:57:27 -0000

Robert Raszuk wrote on 11/05/2020 21:43:
>     I'm not sure this is feasible without changing the IP version number.
> 
> How about IPv6+ ?

the IP version number is maintained in an IANA registry:

https://www.iana.org/assignments/version-numbers/version-numbers.xhtml

So there's no such thing as IPv6+. The version number is integer-only.

Nick