Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA)

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 12 May 2020 22:17 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76213A0C45 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2020 15:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rlbRYUrnmchE for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2020 15:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A853A0C3B for <6man@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2020 15:17:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.46.37]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 04CMGhIM019122 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 May 2020 15:16:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1589321816; x=1589408216; i=@elandsys.com; bh=R5cQ9ca3Kbibw0evR3bEUCeBVhxaSRigAhQwGxr2gnM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=UnAVRBojDZGwI5PJcvnXG1lEzFTsMRXtqujolGqs6AgUMh2QuxsVY11eepCPXRVX8 WsvSXxjHkrpZZ9/4+xXV7JbXvARhHtUz0DIeEJPSuLmP3mVQyAzbuYVXIOOpbsa9tc EZn3zLoZ8+3K7anQKpQwN07R9LrMvgQnbtEuPfiM=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200512151203.1235f5c8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 15:16:25 -0700
To: 6man@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA)
In-Reply-To: <f4ab18fe-3321-fc1e-5cdb-6a3aa5e5993f@gmail.com>
References: <DM6PR05MB6348FA1FC00258ACE4FDE444AEA10@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CALx6S35EncqhfBCP0aZHqBQ2MBT1VSxpRUB59dOTBpP4wwFsjg@mail.gmail.com> <41a5a637-7b77-e9b8-180a-9a0d0958edfd@gmail.com> <CAOj+MMEu5SgQEFSSxNiZnthm=jMAMQE301PGycdteitqk2d27A@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR05MB634828DFCB535CA7E7CEA3FAAEBE0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CE0C1AE3-8CF6-4503-AB54-8BA21891F9B7@gmail.com> <f4ab18fe-3321-fc1e-5cdb-6a3aa5e5993f@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Y08COi00-qegx6wToew7iIkAuQA>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 22:17:10 -0000

Hello,
At 01:29 PM 12-05-2020, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>Yes, there would be a lot of competition if there was a *serious* proposal
>to add a new protocol number. Maybe we should make the first provision of
>IPv7 that there should be a sub-version number.

IPv7 was specified in RFC 1475.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy