RE: Header Insertion and TI-FA
Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com> Tue, 12 May 2020 17:12 UTC
Return-Path: <andrew.alston@liquidtelecom.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85F63A07D0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2020 10:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AC_DIV_BONANZA=0.001, BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UVRIRumQ7MHR for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2020 10:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-182.mimecast.com (eu-smtp-delivery-182.mimecast.com [185.58.86.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FF723A07C8 for <6man@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2020 10:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR02-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-he1eur02lp2057.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.5.57]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-83-ubZnGhvtOryttI8J-KMIlw-1; Tue, 12 May 2020 18:12:08 +0100
X-MC-Unique: ubZnGhvtOryttI8J-KMIlw-1
Received: from VI1PR03MB5056.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:803:bf::31) by VI1PR03MB3742.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:803:2b::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2979.26; Tue, 12 May 2020 17:12:06 +0000
Received: from VI1PR03MB5056.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ed68:9303:79e0:cc49]) by VI1PR03MB5056.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ed68:9303:79e0:cc49%4]) with mapi id 15.20.2979.033; Tue, 12 May 2020 17:12:06 +0000
From: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril@cisco.com>
CC: "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Header Insertion and TI-FA
Thread-Topic: Header Insertion and TI-FA
Thread-Index: AdYnknQqAO/1C9hyQECELexezObcNgABpa0AAAEH7OAAAS7FgAAA/LmAAAHloQAAAbTu8AAMDDcAAB5LyYAACJ+PwA==
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 17:12:06 +0000
Message-ID: <VI1PR03MB5056144B7E48E7E5870A9FEBEEBE0@VI1PR03MB5056.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DM6PR05MB6348FA1FC00258ACE4FDE444AEA10@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CABNhwV3-dMPg6SAAEz+uWre-rj6j5=1JgyyQyKyz_qn7f7mJwQ@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR05MB634848D379A428372C166DD4AEA10@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMEBVA+yK9cFXSe=GVUeH01ipi++nwCRQU_nQCxsKhyvRg@mail.gmail.com> <1B1A2C98-20F0-43F8-A299-C839D14A245C@gmail.com> <CABNhwV3m+2+Wt2CHRRhznEvTZ5KQdounv0e=icfbs4VOcoU0Rw@mail.gmail.com> <MWHPR11MB13740F8547CF700EC38CE4F5C9A10@MWHPR11MB1374.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <25749431-314A-49D5-9861-C80F82E992BE@liquidtelecom.com> <MWHPR11MB1374C73B1ADAAA716988ED51C9BE0@MWHPR11MB1374.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR11MB1374C73B1ADAAA716988ED51C9BE0@MWHPR11MB1374.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [2c0f:fe40:3:2:c10b:29fc:27cc:6340]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3f41d8bc-1381-4a25-0fff-08d7f6979940
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VI1PR03MB3742:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <VI1PR03MB374270B57E2F3D8DA5F35F33EEBE0@VI1PR03MB3742.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0401647B7F
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:VI1PR03MB5056.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(136003)(376002)(346002)(396003)(39860400002)(366004)(33430700001)(316002)(8936002)(33656002)(5660300002)(8676002)(9686003)(55016002)(54906003)(186003)(166002)(53546011)(6506007)(478600001)(966005)(4326008)(7696005)(52536014)(2906002)(66476007)(71200400001)(76116006)(66946007)(66446008)(64756008)(86362001)(6916009)(33440700001)(66556008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: liquidtelecom.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3f41d8bc-1381-4a25-0fff-08d7f6979940
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 12 May 2020 17:12:06.6412 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 68792612-0f0e-46cb-b16a-fcb82fd80cb1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: ETlSfbCbyPciG/lkxvmb0LarGQ1BqAFLZbkT6enyyzXdHQqKYIn7VQxV3OYa4k1Qxcojb0r/f+FKxBgN9WwJNKlshyaZahi6VVj97RUVSa4=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR03MB3742
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: liquidtelecom.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_VI1PR03MB5056144B7E48E7E5870A9FEBEEBE0VI1PR03MB5056eurp_"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/T-sKhR6Szz8GYi4CJKT8hCraIvM>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 17:12:19 -0000
Pablo, Why thank you for the links – I’ve read all of these. Problem is – its disputed. Over and over and over again – by many many people. And while you want to state your views as gospel truth – sadly – that’s just not the way this works. Right now – I see a total lack of consensus on the very issues these emails refer to, both in SPRING and on this list – by person after person. So while you may wish that your opinion is the one and only truth – your opinion – does not grant consensus. In the face of a lack of consensus on an issue relating to a draft – that the authors of said draft have refused to budge on – I fail to see how consensus can exist for that draft. Please remember – while I realize who you work for – and I realize that you have strong opinions – they are not the only opinions – and they do not form solo consensus Thanks Andrew From: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) <pcamaril@cisco.com> Sent: Tuesday, 12 May 2020 18:25 To: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com> Cc: 6man@ietf.org; Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Header Insertion and TI-FA Andrew, We have already been there. Please refer to the following email threads: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/pGS5O53VTDSt2tpc7mm3FVVd0Xk/<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/pGS5O53VTDSt2tpc7mm3FVVd0Xk> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/JdpSLS7ax0VUZLG6SINxnOWJzbY/<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/JdpSLS7ax0VUZLG6SINxnOWJzbY> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/nbAdEl4HwCeRRzXEWnzxVnBt_YQ/<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/nbAdEl4HwCeRRzXEWnzxVnBt_YQ> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/i0faTfqB-NduzI2VyMyQ6R60dQw/<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/i0faTfqB-NduzI2VyMyQ6R60dQw> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/6ZNyPMuZaaP9amVRXQdX9uRMbVk/<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/6ZNyPMuZaaP9amVRXQdX9uRMbVk> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/plidxjZFBnd4_mEzGsLC76FZmQ0/<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/plidxjZFBnd4_mEzGsLC76FZmQ0> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/QO9qXpv1qlTXfOfFPWrhEw0KJbc/<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/QO9qXpv1qlTXfOfFPWrhEw0KJbc> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/67ZG76XRezPXilsP3x339rGpcso/<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/67ZG76XRezPXilsP3x339rGpcso> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/C20J-h835TJYHH2Q4KCHaS_lmek/<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/C20J-h835TJYHH2Q4KCHaS_lmek> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/65GgH7fY3_TDEbE7dNXwSz64l58/<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/65GgH7fY3_TDEbE7dNXwSz64l58> Regards, Pablo. From: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com<mailto:Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>> Sent: lunes, 11 de mayo de 2020 21:35 To: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) <pcamaril@cisco.com<mailto:pcamaril@cisco.com>>; Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com<mailto:hayabusagsm@gmail.com>> Cc: 6man@ietf.org<mailto:6man@ietf.org> Subject: Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Correct me if I am wrong – but – removal is still in there – which violates exactly the same section of text and breaks things like the AH? Or are we saying – its ok to only half violate the text? 😊 Andrew From: ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" <pcamaril=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:pcamaril=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> Date: Monday, 11 May 2020 at 20:13 To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com<mailto:hayabusagsm@gmail.com>> Cc: "6man@ietf.org<mailto:6man@ietf.org>" <6man@ietf.org<mailto:6man@ietf.org>> Subject: RE: Header Insertion and TI-FA Gyan, SRH insertion is NOT part of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-15. (SRH insertion is documented in draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-net-pgm-insertion-02 with a normative reference to draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion-08). > Spring - Please provide section within PGM that has the verbiage of the 6in6 encapsulation This is already in the net-pgm draft (since rev 00). Please see https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-15#section-5<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-15#section-5> . Thanks, Pablo. From: ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Gyan Mishra Sent: lunes, 11 de mayo de 2020 18:02 To: Krzysztof Szarkowicz <kszarkowicz@gmail.com<mailto:kszarkowicz@gmail.com>> Cc: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>>; 6man <6man@ietf.org<mailto:6man@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Krzysztof So you agree with what I stated as the workaround. Please read through exactly what I stated as the complete workaround. If we are all in agreement with the prepend (6in6) encap) workaround can we have the PGM draft updated to reflect. All With regards to the 6MAN appeal, the issues were PSP and this issue with TI-LFA from what I recall. Was their any other issue outside of these two mentioned in the appeal that we need to address and come up with a workaround? Thank you Gyan On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:09 AM Krzysztof Szarkowicz <kszarkowicz@gmail.com<mailto:kszarkowicz@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Robert, If we have prepend, why bother with insertion at all? Prepend (6in6 encap) is much cleaner, IMHO. Regards, Krzysztof > On 2020 -May-11, at 16:38, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net<mailto:robert@raszuk.net>> wrote: > > Hi Ron, > > > normalizing header insertion for the special case where the PLR is a segment endpoint > > When an operator is serious about good data plane protection with TI-LFA all nodes in the network will be enabled for SR. The less overhead required for the protection the better. You may just not have a room for adding additional 40 bytes to each packet at each potential PLR without fragmentation. > > Regarding all of your other TI-LFA related questions - I am sure Krzysztof will be happy to answer them for you internally :) After all this is what your public demo was all about .... > > Best, > Robert, > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org> > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6> > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6> -------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Gyan Mishra Network Engineering & Technology Verizon Silver Spring, MD 20904 Phone: 301 502-1347 Email: gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com<mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>
- Header Insertion and TI-FA Ron Bonica
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Gyan Mishra
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Gyan Mishra
- RE: Header Insertion and TI-FA Ron Bonica
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Robert Raszuk
- Other use cases for header insertion (was Re: Hea… Tom Herbert
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Tom Herbert
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Gyan Mishra
- RE: Header Insertion and TI-FA Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Andrew Alston
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Andrew Alston
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Mark Smith
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Gyan Mishra
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Mark Smith
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Nick Hilliard
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Tom Herbert
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Andrew Alston
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Gyan Mishra
- RE: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Ron Bonica
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Stewart Bryant
- RE: Header Insertion and TI-FA Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- RE: Header Insertion and TI-FA Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- RE: Header Insertion and TI-FA Andrew Alston
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Mark Smith
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Mark Smith
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Robert Raszuk
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… S Moonesamy
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Tom Herbert
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Uma Chunduri
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Fernando Gont
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Uma Chunduri
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Fernando Gont