IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 12 May 2020 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170853A0AC4 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yl6ebu2Mimv8 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1031.google.com (mail-pj1-x1031.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1031]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 220DD3A0AB3 for <6man@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1031.google.com with SMTP id a5so10105793pjh.2 for <6man@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Sy472qnlef2c03THrWjv2kvCAGY3pX1HxW6BOQE/aH4=; b=L582hee50i1zNqOE8X7O0ocldYH8uHWVGjKb+EOdLcJ/G9uuv9Vb6uJ0Pv4hd/oRWm u6Chhar1w8y3/6ul1Iu9bNoSenrPendObWbiIjhA7wwr7dkg4/XBr37H1Wm+PJ4S3DV8 /RcDU1E7qFsmVk05iGlAdQKg6Pmsm3ZXHQsIQVsqRCcmoyzAYFpGVfvkXUQE4yn42XAK KEgYp3sF+osXOxQdcoa2aycQ98FV7zl617EYCyWHvRQskAHtVhLjFJ3QB1xk+ZrZitNB 2VaHweJ+uIi5VxneTdEK86LbsdsOZSNSGPqAVidmh69yptR2+nopo0w1X2Jc0sOowMes B2bw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Sy472qnlef2c03THrWjv2kvCAGY3pX1HxW6BOQE/aH4=; b=qwsAJ9uALAjjwMA7Pd8NkJSZWg6YFS7EOuGAZ5uZFFVgyqLiik1GEKar6jA62X9Dgp m24acfWIpXqtuH3HMfKry1bTlCp8jYiMmwUDSKxb5ou9PaTz8gQfoGHXYDXscRmSBBYD hSnaFqWMs9++TwDLlp3T9KCesu8mjy/q9/Ww3Qfno7tZ1AUCR4d8Ys4JnUN9tOVULnjo RtOjauBAqfiYWPHzCbZ+d1tE6S7K0KK/EZDfRMMLWGJOWetmJ2FPxbgh74qyCpdE6l2Z 9CJJ/6XzmWtviRO0AqGEaeAqSN9pYY3jZHoPlsP246OZXX/Uk3jUFjiy0N2b8kJxrPWX LmCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Puac1fAa65nGQ5Nh8hz/rfcYK70HXtnkDO0wXRlhp/8NT81HW7Jt uqDmHUKs/DgVnnpUiMIGdA+8ob5m
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJp5xf/O4CvHL6Wy97JUtL64mWY89wTdwOG7NZus1hfAT44dvRxx8GWfDWIGWpiYATYdM/nkQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3547:: with SMTP id lt7mr23791997pjb.14.1589315376129; Tue, 12 May 2020 13:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([165.84.12.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z190sm12687903pfz.84.2020.05.12.13.29.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 May 2020 13:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA)
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>
References: <DM6PR05MB6348FA1FC00258ACE4FDE444AEA10@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CALx6S35EncqhfBCP0aZHqBQ2MBT1VSxpRUB59dOTBpP4wwFsjg@mail.gmail.com> <41a5a637-7b77-e9b8-180a-9a0d0958edfd@gmail.com> <CAOj+MMEu5SgQEFSSxNiZnthm=jMAMQE301PGycdteitqk2d27A@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR05MB634828DFCB535CA7E7CEA3FAAEBE0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CE0C1AE3-8CF6-4503-AB54-8BA21891F9B7@gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <f4ab18fe-3321-fc1e-5cdb-6a3aa5e5993f@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 08:29:31 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CE0C1AE3-8CF6-4503-AB54-8BA21891F9B7@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/OKk5Ko-3vHE5SuXHG7YwjIbljxU>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 20:29:38 -0000

On 13-May-20 02:56, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> It would also mean a new Ethertype, and I am sure that as we think about it other issues will come up.
> 
> … but I am sure that you are not the only one wondering the same thing.

Yes, there would be a lot of competition if there was a *serious* proposal
to add a new protocol number. Maybe we should make the first provision of
IPv7 that there should be a sub-version number.

Sigh.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email