Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA
Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Mon, 11 May 2020 16:01 UTC
Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDBE3A08D3 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2020 09:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ER_i1Tah56Ij for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2020 09:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd30.google.com (mail-io1-xd30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A813B3A08DA for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2020 09:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd30.google.com with SMTP id x5so1217709ioh.6 for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2020 09:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=B0Y/yHpWIkJqPYjPS4LXhRu3g4Lm/20Eyuyh9nxdd2c=; b=W6DDPjxVSYYdLyH7/AKMYf7msGDDSQ1WqJHhmnGpJ4Xwcc6YCYujYKj/6p2xLNpg1x bDFHsfrDW8fP3j0FZb1gMqcmW57zvcypWJrNbQeZYFRaNoJWhKUse5HOMaww/+pYaNZu wwbk56GEIp4vh6rUA3MidBC+GPlZlI5hgDBgtns9IJVl2r+4pgHc3PCWLGJ4E3ClhqZC Jbru396cMKABVS5F0YeVRXJi4kEayTSj3bWgtmJ7bmDTC5cvO+S/dBtYaJ/SV0b3LhFe hpMzBX3OjmHXr1nSfz1aCV1jBHZgjC2Q/82zb7iP4+R/h5wb5/xHaAj2lFoChkRRyclB xfSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=B0Y/yHpWIkJqPYjPS4LXhRu3g4Lm/20Eyuyh9nxdd2c=; b=j4evlgt+GgLaqQkiX6tSgwDWRbRsoks4vht64woLq2BuiKh2UvGhUCuojGpAKadpH9 aBsMLJF1eAUyv5taBVry/OBa9+cp0iuHPM5ZtrFkH4qQaEoNkffESDDPE0QqSg3EBYqO z4kMzwEcrvlAKnBeWxpls+5/CVu6qRcOoBeJTyJ/MLBWNqjjbfwgiw4DtZ6Jlltwmg8J 36HSjmyuTyUov4OLGA2hPgE+aIUW9e3BHZvGvIKyBx49gQAqGkcLQSmsbZyFy7G+uVMW Q6ljsLYzMyROrm4rPaGenrMMmg0PQ15Tvxcw6RKWGeetYjIXVLTZ5+VIUusxkwxmKY7T 9u1Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubDKZ1XyzybN0U1nUAXtkJ2BCDMIXtjDsKLN0PlP9BXAp561baj aEqAcsM+zSyeeluU8RgCDA9xputwZjJVgiA8VRc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKzTSuRzaSeM5lhgpdJOVftPHPzVu71T/33mC8SoX9X4gTOUKpckELSjFVpSM9wUf8Iu+JK5Wnoq2eneNxzJ88=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:cf18:: with SMTP id q24mr12499703jar.50.1589212900812; Mon, 11 May 2020 09:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DM6PR05MB6348FA1FC00258ACE4FDE444AEA10@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CABNhwV3-dMPg6SAAEz+uWre-rj6j5=1JgyyQyKyz_qn7f7mJwQ@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR05MB634848D379A428372C166DD4AEA10@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMEBVA+yK9cFXSe=GVUeH01ipi++nwCRQU_nQCxsKhyvRg@mail.gmail.com> <1B1A2C98-20F0-43F8-A299-C839D14A245C@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1B1A2C98-20F0-43F8-A299-C839D14A245C@gmail.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 12:01:30 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV3m+2+Wt2CHRRhznEvTZ5KQdounv0e=icfbs4VOcoU0Rw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA
To: Krzysztof Szarkowicz <kszarkowicz@gmail.com>
Cc: 6man <6man@ietf.org>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006cec0b05a56176a6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/jkV9BfvEE1zVgxZcJNRKFWSFKcI>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 16:01:45 -0000
Krzysztof So you agree with what I stated as the workaround. Please read through exactly what I stated as the complete workaround. If we are all in agreement with the prepend (6in6) encap) workaround can we have the PGM draft updated to reflect. All With regards to the 6MAN appeal, the issues were PSP and this issue with TI-LFA from what I recall. Was their any other issue outside of these two mentioned in the appeal that we need to address and come up with a workaround? Thank you Gyan On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:09 AM Krzysztof Szarkowicz <kszarkowicz@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > If we have prepend, why bother with insertion at all? Prepend (6in6 encap) > is much cleaner, IMHO. > > Regards, > Krzysztof > > > On 2020 -May-11, at 16:38, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote: > > > > Hi Ron, > > > > > normalizing header insertion for the special case where the PLR is a > segment endpoint > > > > When an operator is serious about good data plane protection with TI-LFA > all nodes in the network will be enabled for SR. The less overhead required > for the protection the better. You may just not have a room for adding > additional 40 bytes to each packet at each potential PLR without > fragmentation. > > > > Regarding all of your other TI-LFA related questions - I am sure > Krzysztof will be happy to answer them for you internally :) After all > this is what your public demo was all about .... > > > > Best, > > Robert, > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > > ipv6@ietf.org > > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- Gyan Mishra Network Engineering & Technology Verizon Silver Spring, MD 20904 Phone: 301 502-1347 Email: gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com
- Header Insertion and TI-FA Ron Bonica
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Gyan Mishra
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Gyan Mishra
- RE: Header Insertion and TI-FA Ron Bonica
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Robert Raszuk
- Other use cases for header insertion (was Re: Hea… Tom Herbert
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Tom Herbert
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Krzysztof Szarkowicz
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Gyan Mishra
- RE: Header Insertion and TI-FA Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Andrew Alston
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Andrew Alston
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Mark Smith
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Gyan Mishra
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Mark Smith
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Nick Hilliard
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Tom Herbert
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Andrew Alston
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Gyan Mishra
- RE: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Ron Bonica
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Stewart Bryant
- RE: Header Insertion and TI-FA Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- RE: Header Insertion and TI-FA Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- RE: Header Insertion and TI-FA Andrew Alston
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Mark Smith
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Mark Smith
- Re: Header Insertion and TI-FA Robert Raszuk
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… S Moonesamy
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Tom Herbert
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Uma Chunduri
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Fernando Gont
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Uma Chunduri
- Re: Other use cases for header insertion (was Re:… Fernando Gont