IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 28 February 2019 02:09 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697F4130ECF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:09:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LxZAi1TaG7HI for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:09:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com (mail-ed1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80E901293B1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:09:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id x7so15612498eds.8 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:09:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=hvWUxd6vMhKziyB+u47+PHh7iXObeLdOSumIS7drDNo=; b=nibbwVceQx6kwCsuzZMXBtkldr0xfJ3D9sqRue0AABr3ha+/gOB4LbvmI9dv6wgi26 9bkI6EZQHhc7u4YLzGLayp6DJj2vzIvPE2xo+lrtT924VCyJCJn3nH3k7coeRwQ/sD37 ALHG9CPau8nEfHZ6vrYwYNA1+QI+ZoLHyS0V9Cgkikoos1rSyP9IEK80XeKppvthOvUj BcFD/Dl0ttDvAKeJSBeHFec/yc5f7ydkdnsQZkekid67Rd0VUmHcpuMFI5C5r2MbNElA Te5FC6XuHbKnoM/dE5vsh85He803isJfZm5fosWGCWpwlgLqAN+KmL6zO90WDd2CQDVh v//w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=hvWUxd6vMhKziyB+u47+PHh7iXObeLdOSumIS7drDNo=; b=JPnghtujfkViSX02rCom7MzpHvrei3TUElKTC10QzfOMcfxND+yk1GCWS9tpCfClH3 IHk7E2KZOSBT2s7b0dlC8/1Hdj2uPJo7wSoU/mgBHM0fyHezJpju5QzeG9NqEDhERN9O 2cs+15TJHBeBwgqupqZae5FKcvYH8rmZKuEPfvAx4kTXUVKPFjMrks6jsCDUAxxLJriw nUKmuerMQJTrMEsLQZFWxMnJDnbTpIWuqwWLuY6EM7Gzy5kgp9InZ9O8vLo/V6zdWv/w VdmizPkQocgXwEFCiBh+KghbsRdN3xfRaLAstUCGpSiV5wFuE5z7/arJVjYKZ0c1JmuQ 6Q4g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZt/2+qh6ycd2/r6AeFbpUmeN4KZRHL/Qp22JJgnMkJdvXdvupF mOGQKWHt+SzmjX+kY0QxRZNEQ/7j
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IaakQgGJ6PDjIKy8PfuDuSVAyXf3q9HwKNt77q6mcEJHX7J89cPhsq/06ya0xclNr3TzXrx8A==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:dc51:: with SMTP id g17mr4823031edu.240.1551319758934; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:09:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5600:164::100b? ([2600:8802:5600:164::100b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z42sm4704498edd.29.2019.02.27.18.09.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:09:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <F0CD8E69-4ACD-4FB6-8797-B4D635CA229D@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CA17F6FE-A925-47AF-B224-3E73234AD46A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.2\))
Subject: Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:09:14 -0800
In-Reply-To: <m1gya2p-0000HVC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
To: Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-6@u-1.phicoh.com>
References: <6D78F4B2-A30D-4562-AC21-E4D3DE019D90@consulintel.es> <20190220113603.GK71606@Space.Net> <28fbc2c305c640c9afb3704050f6e8d7@boeing.com> <20190220213107.GS71606@Space.Net> <019c552eb1624d348641d6930829fd1f@boeing.com> <CAKD1Yr0HBG+rhyFWg9zh0t3mW486Mjx9umjn+CRqAZg4z9r0dg@mail.gmail.com> <20190221073530.GT71606@Space.Net> <CAO42Z2wmB2W52b4MZ2h9sW5E9cQKm-HRjyf--q8C26jezS7LXQ@mail.gmail.com> <a73818d31db7422b99a524bc431b00ed@boeing.com> <CAO42Z2z9-48Gbb_Exf+oWUqDO=axSLpZBtqeDcxkAoFq5OziGw@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S3624hnGauG1HaSWPMvQw0t2Q5R3gb8W4R8w3kuK7dcrWQ@mail.gmail.com> <1F07F2BB-2F37-4D12-9731-7892DF4E3D88@consulintel.es> <0a582916-af14-bd82-a4cd-002a36f8830b@huitema.net> <67515a73-26a5-3ed0-da88-1a4ce64550d3@foobar.org> <360afa02-cf23-375c-4876-780d3c2aa5ac@gont.com.ar> <CAHL_VyD34V=TRcsCp0DOO9HJNHyy5xkiMQ_cZoBa7zTE4fe5OA@mail.gmail.com> <ead01e0a-9211-7944-88d6-ae8d037c03a8@si6networks.com> <FB8B77EE-CC16-4418-BB5E-D44EE66D6B72@jisc.ac.uk> <29dcc6ed-03f6-3ead-6866-eecbefdf 1483@si6networks.com> <899A1249-D3D9-4824-8B2E-7E950FBB316A@jisc.ac.uk> <m1gya2p-0000HVC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/0gO1bGcoIDQRI36Mj-esTG7kR4A>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 02:09:23 -0000


> On Feb 26, 2019, at 2:33 AM, Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-6@u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:
> 
> A long time ago, the model was that you would get a prefix from your ISP
> and that was the only global prefix on the local network.

Which might make sense if you have exactly one ISP....

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war,
Defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
     Sun Tzu

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email