Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[e-mail]>]

Of course, not acceptable. I'm not saying that is not a problem to be solved, just tried to make the data more precise. My reading of your text was like "dynamic is over static".

Saludos,
Jordi
 
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Fernando Gont <[e-mail]>
Fecha: miércoles, 20 de febrero de 2019, 14:38
Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[e-mail]>, Ole Troan <[e-mail]>
CC: 6man WG <[e-mail]>
Asunto: Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios

    On 20/2/19 01:56, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
    > Well, significant ... 37% dynamic, vs. 63% static.
    
    Of course it's significant. Would you consider 37% failure rate acceptable?
    
    
    
    > And from the dynamic ones, 40% allows to be static. From that 38% charge extra cost for it (on top of stable IPv4, if provided).
    
    I don't care about "allows". Either it works by default, or it doesn't.
    If you expect a normal user to enter an ISP's web site and make
    decisions about prefixes or pay more to workaround the lack of
    robustness of what we ship, you are doing very bad engineering.
    
    
    It puzzles me that instead of trying to improve things, some seem to
    apply this problem-solving methodology:
    https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/416cjJcmM-L.jpg
    
    Thanks,
    -- 
    Fernando Gont
    SI6 Networks
    e-mail: [e-mail]
    PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
    
    
    
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.