Re: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09.txt>

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Mon, 10 July 2017 23:33 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5649F127977 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A3GdBx_ydJxd for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x230.google.com (mail-vk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED08D1200ED for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id y70so55846221vky.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2ldHoESyRcp9PootEnfn46RkRn2RIIQmyWixALZAZro=; b=efr5srwVnaXdVspE3Db4oG1iS57YSwR7XbXvlZU6zwORFYb+Zn70VS3biofLTFuWoB OZAsUXD9Ai+kmeVOrYMeSM4DfrvPYGG43UJtqVWL0hIwE7dymeZ0PHDLSOr0ws1gHUW1 h5TL/0BYZQ8+9jPE2ej/x1tTVWjLGOrO7QVDfiLLfEwirF/THGm2AQBrshiFd93TV7WB KXK16h6q7Z2w2JjZpDJNKov98nYnwU35PRgrBAkinyZ2rLv5MRH2vpXXRcC9hIZly499 8fy7e8ZgtlGn+ZcpEAAfj5x2uA4b/R83B7nawWKyoXo5ZZFrX8+d7DJCXK1V/VX/PklL QPxQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2ldHoESyRcp9PootEnfn46RkRn2RIIQmyWixALZAZro=; b=MT2tguMpIYS91L7OuORZRb7OBmc5qcrnXncP5/sxVZ+zZbVXFmqPECSN0lncXlnZ2b jK2/ATxIXVaCvAZioqUVNbLV2LgwOLrfOsA/PzpkOtcNg6/jfXDqkvzT667PzSlUih8k js4HDtj7Jr2GWGBOh+d7on+JLU7MpLrZP74OnzcXWR/subcs3cbMlGSoCzQ/WKKFJ7Kv FypSG3vEVTVJn4dDkW8yCExTS6iivrmfDQlrfIoJMh7Put7nIkQ3ya9DAoWlD3iMLQUd YIg0z0xYlW2vxHCYuFkEKL4DHV1mOYqkXqUXnX9XMgnYqS0UJdqwVi+ALFt4q/VbQ6l3 o77Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112JquYdECrQgH2a97mGsFaL+bsJVrMayxgDw7DIJcX+xIMW5Qur KGPo5LuxEj+LZkV3M/Urq412q3E6xg==
X-Received: by 10.31.218.196 with SMTP id r187mr9308237vkg.96.1499729599977; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.81.100 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <98f52609-f4c5-1975-8237-6f849479c6de@gmail.com>
References: <20150804195752.5065.13523.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5AB14F48-2799-4A86-830D-E8A89CCADAAC@gmail.com> <f0af9f838fe747819eaa381f21e1b9ec@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <98f52609-f4c5-1975-8237-6f849479c6de@gmail.com>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 09:32:49 +1000
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2y4j07uaRKBX7YukhPGDGai-DzW_gy+abq0Q6LFGMi6Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09.txt>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/1hy11yhdoF4QTp_N7XwUp2qGmzs>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 23:33:23 -0000

On 11 July 2017 at 06:52, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> Fred,
>
> On 11/07/2017 03:52, Templin, Fred L wrote:
>> Hi, something that I think is a bit under-specified is whether the address "fe80::"
>> should be considered as an Anycast address. In particular, the leftmost 10 bits
>> are "link-local" and the rightmost 118 bits are all-zero.
>>
>> Should fe80:: be considered as the subnet router Anycast address for "link-local"?
>> If so, I think that it could be mentioned somewhere in Section 2.5 that even the
>> link-local subnet has an Anycast address.
>
> I don't think so. The text in 4291 about the Subnet-Router anycast address says:
> 'The "subnet prefix" in an anycast address is the prefix that identifies a specific link.'
> fe80::/10 does not identify a specific link, since it applies to every link.
> Therefore, fe80:: is logically not a subnet-router anycast address.
>

I would disagree. fe80::/64 identifies a specific link - it identifies
the link the host is attached to - "this" link.

fe80::/64 could also be described as an anycast prefix, because it is
assigned to multiple links. Other prefixes can be anycast prefixes
too.

The forwarding system sends to the closest instance of an anycast
prefix, which in the case of fe80::/64 is always on-link, for other
anycast prefixes it may not and usually won't be. The only thinh
special about fe80::/64 in this context is that is automatically
configured on all links, so it is never an off-link anycast fe80::/64
prefix.

I think this text would have to specifically exclude fe80::/64 if
fe80::/128 is not a router-subnet anycast address.

"Packets sent to the Subnet-Router anycast address will be delivered
   to one router on the subnet.  All routers are required to support the
   Subnet-Router anycast addresses for the subnets to which they have
   interfaces."

Regards,
Mark.

>     Brian
>
>>
>> Thanks - Fred
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bob Hinden
>>> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2017 10:36 AM
>>> To: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
>>> Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
>>> Subject: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09.txt>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I published a new 6man w.g. version (-09) of the RFC4291bis draft.  See links below.
>>>
>>> The summary of the changes are:
>>>
>>>        o   Added text to the last paragraph in Section 2.1 to clarify
>>>            the differences on how subnets are hangled in IPv4 and IPv6,
>>>            includes a reference to RFC5942 "The IPv6 Subnet Model: The
>>>            Relationship between Links and Subnet Prefixes".
>>>
>>>        o   Removed short paragraph about manual configuration in
>>>            Section 2.4.1 that was added in the -08 version.
>>>
>>>        o   Revised "Changes since RFC4291" Section to have a summary of
>>>            changes since RFC4291 and a separate subsection with a change
>>>            history of each Internet Draft.  This subsection will be
>>>            removed when the RFC is published.
>>>
>>>        o   Editorial changes.
>>>
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>>
>>>  https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09
>>>
>>> This is part of the project to move the core IPv6 specifications to Internet Standard.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bob
>>>
>>>> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09.txt
>>>> has been successfully submitted by Robert M. Hinden and posted to the
>>>> IETF repository.
>>>>
>>>> Name:               draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis
>>>> Revision:   09
>>>> Title:              IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture
>>>> Document date:      2017-07-03
>>>> Group:              6man
>>>> Pages:              35
>>>> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09.txt
>>>> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis/
>>>> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09
>>>> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09
>>>> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09
>>>>
>>>> Abstract:
>>>>   This specification defines the addressing architecture of the IP
>>>>   Version 6 (IPv6) protocol.  The document includes the IPv6 addressing
>>>>   model, text representations of IPv6 addresses, definition of IPv6
>>>>   unicast addresses, anycast addresses, and multicast addresses, and an
>>>>   IPv6 node's required addresses.
>>>>
>>>>   This document obsoletes RFC 4291, "IP Version 6 Addressing
>>>>   Architecture".
>>>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6@ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------