Re: IPv6 Routing & ND vs. Addressing, (Was: Re: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09.txt>)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 10 July 2017 23:10 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20FB13193D for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cUJVFuTb106P for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22a.google.com (mail-pf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 066A0131946 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id e7so57115975pfk.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=VvFLDflxAXol7rxUy6w+KOTqDjw8wo1CJV+lFxkUg1w=; b=lGT9gTa7YXOVu0TuA+X2/7B1YBJweBI41fTyb4C0moOcvcSBezhrh7rrxSemjTrUNx v+FLHiR13Y1MKxWXv/4WbGS+249bUxJHwtO6UIqWdKA4F3TmyMGfw3femZYCYRCyv/uk AhHhX+XzMNB2sFEuIqar9PupRiuXWjIqHJDRVl0oDPaK9IdlBngwAS38Qk8Odelqooqm jaV/fI9bDbKbcFkdVUv+1mvjUGIbbOQhj85IRYpBKrxbB8v9h7XEdbqrhPgREByYoWpm ggYGtT99lH0cyvBAiYT3jmIVj4Jb9r52aOPLQH7WrdC8g9YmRZ00PmhUs7t9D15ipsxO XbOQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VvFLDflxAXol7rxUy6w+KOTqDjw8wo1CJV+lFxkUg1w=; b=pa4I5j8H5pgdJAT+WBGvyT1Lfwv8H53iUdBwCVOhAlxoQt7nFhbMlYDpYrfuVg0iGX FktMeHCwibcQyt/Sqza2FvncrNppMoE5R8/u98b3pzEEMXOqBDSD8r5/jULLmqqA48lW fEnujOQScWRIkky8fHuUHjOFuodZw68d8wLpyK6nDHvL6yD0RJbmZ91fi8H9/W9HN9Zw HZ7KQIgKmnuK+Je4dY6z7ANS3vqvuy9G4nC9h9pk1asN/zGCcHyIl/DN/8u8kxebMJy1 Z4TqNA8VcHcOABaRETC8TaOBpj/KoAWE3RXqoRCb+Jm7qNbRHr/llzPmcdbl7tnerKYs Abrw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111TRAWEjW1gbR8/4s8FKCZtwNN/QKWyDnQwCO48e7p4MuTJ6sLk uRIpCs+Yhbw8rk1U
X-Received: by 10.101.91.137 with SMTP id i9mr16720989pgr.27.1499728226365; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.216.38.132] (sc-cs-567-laptop.uoa.auckland.ac.nz. [130.216.38.132]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k18sm23226772pgf.5.2017.07.10.16.10.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IPv6 Routing & ND vs. Addressing, (Was: Re: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09.txt>)
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <CAN-Dau2zgthR2w9e5ZVUdGc-vm+YvK2uTUJ8O=vrcv0jNc58RA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2+Si_tzNF8p6ASf4=StgFSX9Gm3TEj9iiqdE2gHQaNmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau03r_CKW53kegaLa=F_R_RG4cWaCT1j6idrqPm9UuN03A@mail.gmail.com> <5963BF27.1050300@foobar.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <ff09ffcd-df65-4033-8018-fbe7ae98cff8@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:10:23 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5963BF27.1050300@foobar.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/qgWCT6u7QX6bCfoUs0jpVyH8nv0>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 23:10:29 -0000

On 11/07/2017 05:53, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> David Farmer wrote:
>> Or, how broad of an exception should we make?
> 
> /0 to /128 would work for me.
> 
> More seriously, the sentence "Interface IDs are required to be 64 bits
> long" is blocking consensus on this draft, and it is difficult to see
> the draft progressing with this in place.

Agreed. On the other hand, maybe rough consensus could be achieved
with s/required/recommended/, even if some objections remain.
The IETF does not require consensus, only rough consensus.

Neither of our WG Chairs is neutral on this issue; one is the
document editor, the other has a clear opinion, to which he is
completely entitled. Personally, I think the AD could step
in to judge consensus.

(Not to say that David Farmer's text is wrong, but Nick is
correct about the blocking issue.)

     Brian
 
> For static IP address configuration, there no compelling reason to
> specify any mask length restriction.  If someone wants to configure an
> arbitrary netmask on their network, then let them.  If it breaks
> something, they will learn not to do it again.  This is a completely
> self-policing issue and requires no input from the ietf.
> 
> Nick
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> .
>