Re: IPv6 Routing & ND vs. Addressing, (Was: Re: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09.txt>)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 13 July 2017 01:42 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398711252BA for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QIzwGVMInI64 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22f.google.com (mail-pf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A56212EC12 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id c73so21348626pfk.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XlqlRFIT1hwWpUgoy4M651/mJNIqSW68QGzhsUqKm9I=; b=hwGIwhKQ2XGNXl39TBP9empQyKdJ5xc3Pk33oG+xWaOKKi/abLtbI1Siip/NGsjids RJy41eQbbwsU/hgqmd2si64qv3C5lbT3wCDf90eSzOlScb6RqwfvcM7KdU1c9uzyeBhN CCvbKOmXBFt2G0RxOgJzc2ozvguRd7as3Sxy7Vfz6VO975iX1PQUJxtJKVCyrIAvB25V 2eoirgZdYLORwwFfZXnMrJsc1DrYcPETVOFNPd/XLN+X/G/ea8BFXrJSrMLuaBMduHJv UaTDV6/YMGR9cYj+ha1f+ZxMUNyKQacFY32iAK2ML9WQhcc0PjIPnmFpdRl+af1Lq146 iPgw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XlqlRFIT1hwWpUgoy4M651/mJNIqSW68QGzhsUqKm9I=; b=LELlMCRou9dCZcms3kVmXEZ2utu3APSRN/kjE8cT+Z3a8mWaoATGGJ1H9yoN48B1kt k09jNcNh0KcyZ8U0OtTjtdLpWUoAi+WDicbds4juwglTqatItkrBlK19Xa5u4wklzGAy 3u/y1Zfd4WL2oA61mDmZA+w7LtBlMDG+4VEiMbBLYi0iHW/4yZ1WPo2suLzapg9DlfrF s1SpWnFATObOZcd68cRiGXwRpA8mVwpPGoWdCY9wbKWH7hZZOiXQfyAItEnHPWy6+Ny5 QecJEzcwlnm/l41C65fi2o6oddUxZweKrxKY+RWLjAP1GFbxTI6TGGfe86wSamofNgPP QVCQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111DqNFRwE6BMBjMvH2EFYMacutKSpsgu3F8LnjTgT1GgvT2hQlW htEfKlQMhMnJv40P
X-Received: by 10.98.155.4 with SMTP id r4mr59075612pfd.186.1499910156435; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([118.148.68.108]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d74sm8454535pfb.31.2017.07.12.18.42.34 for <ipv6@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IPv6 Routing & ND vs. Addressing, (Was: Re: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09.txt>)
To: ipv6@ietf.org
References: <CAN-Dau2zgthR2w9e5ZVUdGc-vm+YvK2uTUJ8O=vrcv0jNc58RA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2+Si_tzNF8p6ASf4=StgFSX9Gm3TEj9iiqdE2gHQaNmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau03r_CKW53kegaLa=F_R_RG4cWaCT1j6idrqPm9UuN03A@mail.gmail.com> <5963BF27.1050300@foobar.org> <ff09ffcd-df65-4033-8018-fbe7ae98cff8@gmail.com> <6bf7f3d0e9c047b1b86d4bcc220f8705@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAN-Dau1bxm5y0v_6kUBc_ym39bSSxepjdwrzcS7YHWD=CV9-bw@mail.gmail.com> <3b34d6e9718a45ae80877e36fb55f2b4@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAO42Z2x+282VK7nMFHjcCz9tBmJ_=d4OhkiRZFZDLcZhakGB1Q@mail.gmail.com> <30cb27b2-007a-2a39-803d-271297862cae@gmail.com> <40d757eb97564bc8bb0511063bd9d3f4@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAO42Z2x7ER2fUietjT3Ns-jpCqscCmVDVubiM0Dgw1_L0bkw=A@mail.gmail.com> <c7b140bf69104cd3877a7da03fbf17e7@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <32924d19-e5ce-7606-77f4-925b682065f5@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 13:42:38 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c7b140bf69104cd3877a7da03fbf17e7@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/SoJ7gG9_yoAMHb0QnIaGLR7JwlE>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 01:42:39 -0000

On 13/07/2017 06:32, Manfredi, Albert E wrote:
...
> Of course, the other option is to expand using ULAs, but then, that's "so IPv4."

Not. ULA doesn't imply NAT. It just implies private addresses.
I think keeping the addresses of my light switches private and not
globally reachable is a wonderful idea. My lighting controller
might be accessible via a global address, and would hopefully have
much better security than the individual lightswitches.

  Brian