IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv6 Routing & ND vs. Addressing, (Was: Re: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09.txt>)

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 13 July 2017 01:46 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030651317E0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RDIqkX-3P8KV for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x233.google.com (mail-ua0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 833231317DF for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x233.google.com with SMTP id g13so6436207uaj.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DiUasQhhLPfk//D+4FbVGfeyj+Ga8FyLtdNo5Fscki8=; b=DHrz9z8o/VoyoPFr4WtJBpfnSzUl5qY/KGsqO36kVaBumcrq9d6E38UiUaN+xIQOhc n3vViZexX04DzBHhS0Km6c+La0fazQK/GzZsh/qZWxudAS6wBhsn1jeGhi95U4xktm0n LIAJ9Y7NSd84IwV7vxoUpPmYvrIl3AEFayX4WEzBnDHOyvJVPPyIGyeoDUcwtK98EVrb ORUx8z+2RR3JANGWa4wY+Sy8e51JUxp3nplv+6FiAKBpUQGfkok57esfHdadJbzF/dqI KYS8bg7RylCLG5lqzXrXnaLVYkCEOzqc9CFqQ4U0oHAbhZjLejIF/MzmBErRtaVuAgib Cd7g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DiUasQhhLPfk//D+4FbVGfeyj+Ga8FyLtdNo5Fscki8=; b=FdmVkL+ZTnDhKultNQ1AHOXkzGtEfNXAPTogERiwB6EI8r6Hz3hOp4DPNcmbqyYMvM m+btt4Rcpm/bLWu/xp91cDcyEAe8Fh1qe0aB4pk4fV5BmTLxwGV4UMjDRNOakenXyYSC 7JhADfNaYqGcLt3LrTNqgmusEt4FXHyN5CfpMfMk684k8Qxqk0PfBTxHYflvchVE6P1j mS8PQmrnwdKTbcC+ckIVgGh2XgDgNfuhopPQq8OXlauAP08m4TMH3+PAh7J9Meffd3Oc 1AEEZL5FVqvREMdImtGqW4SILEUPMtQcX7jzotAQJ5NSGuevQVAEqKiSZNKYvuztrUEF d1bw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111uAt3XznYyaLbwO3GTSv5nAXsHm34VuQTNaRtw32vdEkvJYm+l DqwJPlHFDqZ9i0RcBzaWxRhItoIZJmXz
X-Received: by 10.176.93.2 with SMTP id u2mr938535uaf.109.1499910393364; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.48.129 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJE_bqfpjhe_aN9pxegcK51yeQmUyjUhh043f4XuJSV2KGFoow@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN-Dau2zgthR2w9e5ZVUdGc-vm+YvK2uTUJ8O=vrcv0jNc58RA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2+Si_tzNF8p6ASf4=StgFSX9Gm3TEj9iiqdE2gHQaNmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau03r_CKW53kegaLa=F_R_RG4cWaCT1j6idrqPm9UuN03A@mail.gmail.com> <5963BF27.1050300@foobar.org> <ff09ffcd-df65-4033-8018-fbe7ae98cff8@gmail.com> <6bf7f3d0e9c047b1b86d4bcc220f8705@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAN-Dau1bxm5y0v_6kUBc_ym39bSSxepjdwrzcS7YHWD=CV9-bw@mail.gmail.com> <3b34d6e9718a45ae80877e36fb55f2b4@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAO42Z2x+282VK7nMFHjcCz9tBmJ_=d4OhkiRZFZDLcZhakGB1Q@mail.gmail.com> <30cb27b2-007a-2a39-803d-271297862cae@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2ifGJaWJpWir8MXbSHcATL181VbA1MMtiQ=8Bzr2WmQw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqfpjhe_aN9pxegcK51yeQmUyjUhh043f4XuJSV2KGFoow@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 10:46:12 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr23tMJ-v0iY2rGOJ41+b25h0Ctqx0gm-C1696WZMtxeMw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IPv6 Routing & ND vs. Addressing, (Was: Re: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09.txt>)
To: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403043621883185b10554291a3e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/uIIbYCfJA24FQz_GBuR5n0i1bmM>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 01:46:36 -0000

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 2:24 AM, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> wrote:

> So I hope we can now focus on the matter of the very original clash
> and see if we can reach consensus through some wordsmithing.  If we
> can't even do that I think it's better to drop rfc4291bis at this
> point.


Agreed on both counts.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email