IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv6 Routing & ND vs. Addressing, (Was: Re: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09.txt>)

DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com> Thu, 13 July 2017 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <dykim6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D61D129482 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:23:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lozGuXfX3mvn for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x234.google.com (mail-pg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EE06126CC4 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x234.google.com with SMTP id k14so20753021pgr.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=nIgNW3O9cv1NC7i1k4kxya3BIOseRUYyswH2AlRHKkU=; b=ESdYaZXun5XTUlc2Rxt8FXZ+dy7hsYKNNVkP6ChGx8Mcbq6j5S6c80BInvKocooq1r nJlZgdYzRqL/C3dfCiJI55GV8G9WjxGpUHIkNk5MvPFHShJ3+nXVd+Ts4FH1QXu47hBi yNvmKwlTyXVMfABx0j+gwpixB8e6vYHxWfVxqCJGjYVXH9BE8PoWymaFxtPnR1rJUI/X 7VXZl76w3FTYggaPxV87mcj/oMHcy49MYQ53Gd7lobpRClT9CXWa1EuZwmameElIu2aM h9e7+29fBMGeP5JUpMQ95INPJEMz/6QhY9m5JxX99D+SJjBHc/6mPv25VqtHMdRhKIk3 fl/A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=nIgNW3O9cv1NC7i1k4kxya3BIOseRUYyswH2AlRHKkU=; b=uWHcyiacotRDCwFv/fnV9zF5rc8Ebv8V8YrOROJBwDFukg/OGlAePzG83OkBA3J4Eu aB+ULhs1WY+WEUTqlgY5MG0C3ge8HpawJgf3G41u/eskooBpvKobTSz4FApTc/sf5dAr ZNhBJVBmHdck2M2ttrVAmHtf6Culd6ImD6jZrHNSo3LPNbPT50fJ159IH4zrvHOVn7Rw L57Lay8ablS2SL/ZmEZkHz1SLkQK3Vm57vm12+eTaHUI34YeCWi/hj4xuISAcZBGCvrB 8cfR+UWXLcDx2QYfv2fbxrWfLKZogmkmHdtE87ImmdsoYkOamSGgcla9K/QAWoLsRA9u 6zvg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110TgmtkdpacttxJwsprewBvL2lgDr+9Ac/Z3YheR/nh4kVuxOq1 Tm1OTa1DyRJsyVzvMNc=
X-Received: by 10.98.98.199 with SMTP id w190mr52666284pfb.44.1499905402630; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [59.29.43.118] ([59.29.43.118]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y2sm5960123pgy.60.2017.07.12.17.23.20 for <ipv6@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: IPv6 Routing & ND vs. Addressing, (Was: Re: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09.txt>)
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 09:23:18 +0900
References: <CAN-Dau2zgthR2w9e5ZVUdGc-vm+YvK2uTUJ8O=vrcv0jNc58RA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2+Si_tzNF8p6ASf4=StgFSX9Gm3TEj9iiqdE2gHQaNmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau03r_CKW53kegaLa=F_R_RG4cWaCT1j6idrqPm9UuN03A@mail.gmail.com> <5963BF27.1050300@foobar.org> <ff09ffcd-df65-4033-8018-fbe7ae98cff8@gmail.com> <6bf7f3d0e9c047b1b86d4bcc220f8705@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAN-Dau1bxm5y0v_6kUBc_ym39bSSxepjdwrzcS7YHWD=CV9-bw@mail.gmail.com> <3b34d6e9718a45ae80877e36fb55f2b4@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAO42Z2x+282VK7nMFHjcCz9tBmJ_=d4OhkiRZFZDLcZhakGB1Q@mail.gmail.com> <30cb27b2-007a-2a39-803d-271297862cae@gmail.com> <40d757eb97564bc8bb0511063bd9d3f4@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAO42Z2x7ER2fUietjT3Ns-jpCqscCmVDVubiM0Dgw1_L0bkw=A@mail.gmail.com> <c7b140bf69104cd3877a7da03fbf17e7@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com>
To: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <c7b140bf69104cd3877a7da03fbf17e7@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Message-Id: <9427A0FF-E957-431A-B381-E2CCE7B07D67@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/ZYxs_eLTs2Qqw6o_ktARGOl74yg>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 00:23:24 -0000

It seems to me that people have to beat rfc7421 first before stopping rfc4291bis from going forwards:

rfc4291bis: "The rationale for using 64 bit Interface Identifiers can be found in [RFC7421].”

—-
DY

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email