IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv6 Routing & ND vs. Addressing, (Was: Re: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09.txt>)

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> Wed, 12 July 2017 05:38 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B04129B29 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LMIT6tx7EoWL for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x235.google.com (mail-yb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13F5812706D for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x235.google.com with SMTP id 84so3789895ybe.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=D2q291yP9sDvi6RJlFENIC6RB0addEZRicaj1RF8So0=; b=Mk3LZdO9mS07Njl73zohGKnHORKo9veq91I2pE+E5GQ4MMDlcRl///pvy1blROfUCG GLBzsUQfpprtmfL+SphJ/u4vMyj5/QIFBlNRdG5AMNrtSZ7rrHDnKXqsZIGwGWzaAskO +uqgcrMfJLyvBVbWo1LmQGgJxnasb8MVyGG9Vjf+9CdoWJ3Yr0ICEpTns47vrJr3GPYN /2JfWiYZ0iy8snCYrSDBBAODU1Iyzv26e2jjdbZrBM9DAcVr1VmvNCTJuMmczlBmLFH1 ai0KRECnhZudRYXnzw82hyfmyFS9Yue0sZXbgC1Fic9Su3yWxPHx975LVg/evRulY54g dA8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=D2q291yP9sDvi6RJlFENIC6RB0addEZRicaj1RF8So0=; b=jNQpvC4qoDDPtaoKHyHb3zcK7y4CTJwEUYhf3fmGBoqJNLdRJE7E6bXwazdgW2V2w5 n1+MXJa4old2YLhsKYjrKEIAFP+BwfxmGk9G+FvHZB88nSUxNsBC9FuzQu44fgOGaF/h Gdr/+Gc8T/SuNQI7y0HjsL/uJMFhF/0pvABxxqs5WRJKiJwtsso85MvwyVmv9cd+FJSS 0MWwvOwEISqbc7rPKrCi9BYwEnH5GszVV0zOaun3WxDMiB+URcKydQc3zIhq8GnsgxhX gHMgfqXvDPgaXKMnQKPkMpiR3t/ONQSKye3exv0nTQkdkXNZdVWTrdvTJsNWELAkbR9c i+ZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110TRdTReaLC42wjSg+D+/ofgAAQjQt62C3/ZeIGHDHhkQ1KaY4Y +P138lquCPk3CA==
X-Received: by 10.37.48.139 with SMTP id w133mr116516ybw.84.1499837935303; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.5] (45-19-110-76.lightspeed.tukrga.sbcglobal.net. [45.19.110.76]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s29sm558366ywa.45.2017.07.11.22.38.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Jul 2017 22:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: IPv6 Routing & ND vs. Addressing, (Was: Re: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09.txt>)
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ff09ffcd-df65-4033-8018-fbe7ae98cff8@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 01:38:54 -0400
Cc: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1DAEB80F-A139-4839-BA4B-78AE2F479595@gmail.com>
References: <CAN-Dau2zgthR2w9e5ZVUdGc-vm+YvK2uTUJ8O=vrcv0jNc58RA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2+Si_tzNF8p6ASf4=StgFSX9Gm3TEj9iiqdE2gHQaNmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau03r_CKW53kegaLa=F_R_RG4cWaCT1j6idrqPm9UuN03A@mail.gmail.com> <5963BF27.1050300@foobar.org> <ff09ffcd-df65-4033-8018-fbe7ae98cff8@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/XajSVv3RgFnK40migkCaE3eUiqg>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 05:38:57 -0000

Hi Brian,

> On Jul 10, 2017, at 7:10 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
> Personally, I think the AD could step
> in to judge consensus.

Yes. I have refrained from actively discussing this topic in order to leave this option open for me if it is required. I sincerely hope that the WG can come to consensus on this issue, though.

Thanks
Suresh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email