IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv6 Routing & ND vs. Addressing, (Was: Re: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09.txt>)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 12 July 2017 02:32 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7737C12EB4A for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W2syYTMdsAI0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:32:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x232.google.com (mail-pg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EF30120725 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:32:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x232.google.com with SMTP id k14so5319467pgr.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:32:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5fc86EdUzmug6TvTzx5YFivsLaswOSJLv1LQXbU22wE=; b=dXCP21zN3yRhft+BlsiOM6PbRXd26JV/AptIuQTLGvrvDWNYjudJRItjbLFIRb9+4w gZB6xidPDRKydPT4W/E8euZfHvHqU4OF9PuSrsDr2/FntgTnB7tgJqgurB09uGhcmZAu VP6NYWPLukAysUhxXb30mHPX/3m/JpM+/fqr4bUxhMY5dmGecOQJsOzBN/Th0MgXJlVF wlEKoux8cQOuiYTIve+geGH6Z4VJjLArH2bt/Jr2wnM4uSwMRm1+JQUjKWLyP/KFHIjM itrXDl6/+s1vtO0J4rGYWqt6gkaI2ypPlGO+0Ldv//plyOyxFuUcdxmhaR9VLO98eCas YOnA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5fc86EdUzmug6TvTzx5YFivsLaswOSJLv1LQXbU22wE=; b=Ya7ifvAfReQoCuUOUMurunCQl8E0/3Xjx6anENgvBjfP+TkmTezdIPVAVrsMX5snIc tqTppdqrZog0tFSsbpu21ZRbhPVtCWlX2vUy0PXrQLn+cdFIysi7uV7oWdbyA/krY8AW 5KZNESppAOsaCMZHDSKJ1FPBuroAcZonEkqdffpGH8FqDE7zgjUq9pf6mzBfRi3Wxyfi SgksoLcMskKOMHbK7kNMFYjBZt2Phi5Cm/0BNXvqQIJ4fe4DJYgAI1QJiLPqINAORapq zbC1gBOKzLB7sssih2V92RDMf5rV3KaxJAQapzHGDvcxhT9WzjUc6dQPOB74/HA4OUtr jRQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110pkQ/6F9Nrj4OHvzfqnZrKh5p5ixtQIdFySrBZYz6WqugMbJCC nLKABfhdOLOcoL9i
X-Received: by 10.84.229.5 with SMTP id b5mr1611593plk.164.1499826770497; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([118.148.76.144]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 10sm1163538pfo.134.2017.07.11.19.32.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IPv6 Routing & ND vs. Addressing, (Was: Re: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-09.txt>)
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Cc: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <CAN-Dau2zgthR2w9e5ZVUdGc-vm+YvK2uTUJ8O=vrcv0jNc58RA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2+Si_tzNF8p6ASf4=StgFSX9Gm3TEj9iiqdE2gHQaNmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau03r_CKW53kegaLa=F_R_RG4cWaCT1j6idrqPm9UuN03A@mail.gmail.com> <5963BF27.1050300@foobar.org> <ff09ffcd-df65-4033-8018-fbe7ae98cff8@gmail.com> <8BB052D8-221B-4BEC-B556-A06A63454807@employees.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <71ee0acd-9f4b-c5ea-baf8-4861e882df9e@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:32:49 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8BB052D8-221B-4BEC-B556-A06A63454807@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/AQ6nhv9OjyuVO4ubp3hPGyI5Xqg>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 02:32:52 -0000

Ole,

It seems to me that you have always been indicating that you think the text
should say, effectively, that the IID length MUST be 64 (except for the
well know exceptions).

I apologise if that is incorrect.

Regards
   Brian

On 12/07/2017 03:22, Ole Troan wrote:
> Brian,
> 
>> On 11 Jul 2017, at 01:10, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Neither of our WG Chairs is neutral on this issue; one is the
>> document editor, the other has a clear opinion, to which he is
>> completely entitled. Personally, I think the AD could step
>> in to judge consensus.
> 
> What is my opinion? Could you please summarize?
> It might be clearer to you than me. :-)
> 
> Ole
> .
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email