Re: 6MAN Working group last call: draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Mon, 14 March 2016 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FDF12D63E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.35
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.35 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cpuSISli8gy3 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x233.google.com (mail-ig0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E66512DBE5 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-x233.google.com with SMTP id vf5so65571144igb.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=Z12QZ6c84Q9+G18GFIQs7X9bbRgF7umrD0mWjxEjW18=; b=qbKrzIlR+kUFEKCHkr0+AwPF8LrLi7jYDD2YfwHhitOCp9aQ8JX+85+cK1dkwvay3r 41VmEBozgXzPaafeN5LxPzaK7g+yNEcERoZD3R+Ezor6n5yBLlmu9rv3ArYb7hHjxC20 5Y0DkvFXOw5BUEZQ0HbwGIqrz0m930s342G6+EP3q2ZIbl8kEIKfKFPZN7IaFzYmGqiD JUBbAFWDt9106HTgKrbSHQXmsegBd1AtcWA3Xw23DX9EQcNgN4OLQayFzbbYwipVdRxA eVofxQkRIOJBKeo6aYKtRe56wGuWevNAz2MGWI1QxfgqMAwOzXMc+UFfDXuwTvdb2xNB wEdw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=Z12QZ6c84Q9+G18GFIQs7X9bbRgF7umrD0mWjxEjW18=; b=iSnd8/SqvZZJIWVw7olrvvQEBxZwL4tsJ49eP6Rk3PYAEPIG6pJ9MnpmFAUPmokk/4 jFqLmhoXxEkCYPeurdeGWnY/zZfLzvsHJGZ+67u3Bm8wSaGwTZOourueJqoQBqWo9Q8A VsqP/TvwaHipzqe8uWF+laTJC2RBWHQL/ckag/BhvabuZV+Zep+T+MEP3Fs+tOyxsalY 0dqmB/gHUwQITkGP2PHgoJ3FUS5Cv2nrhTggemCRShR6XT17t2TQyCKVUSrQ+WyG+IL2 EAAH6tW68A302NTyjiZEHSyL8J+w3Wd/c4E0OTV4dJkTdshezu2/lnZ+ITyoKiUvPpf8 Smeg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKjOb2uOT+N5XPAwPTTsxAzxLsDtP2nh3pe5ZMPXe80RwEOo/x5NS5zK3XVwlrfGMfsgtZ78lkO4c6lHQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.43.226 with SMTP id z2mr19214386igl.78.1457973143543; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.8.88 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPK2DezV9vKYrHCAJJ_bFQZa02MCJMPdX7=BtL-tPzOj+da6vQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6AC58C26-01B6-4C16-851F-0C1228CDD2AF@employees.org> <CAJE_bqfvE0jGoRi2X=ohpqsXmGx9AVKnjeGH-P8zWp6=3_kbVA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPK2DewJ0uF9i_uaKLCn5gM_KGm2uv5B0a2VFm7cmNNn5acQPQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqcetbtgsje4TqCpUF+zoUL19RHjWj2-xg+N39i8XodDVQ@mail.gmail.com> <517ACBE4-46C3-40C7-86E5-5906309E6BA9@employees.org> <CAJE_bqfeLxURYwMDcjMtSnyb2WBeYu_5Yq_2Yyo_O9sqHRn+og@mail.gmail.com> <73EEC8CE-EDC8-45FC-AE4F-F390F965304F@employees.org> <CAPK2DezV9vKYrHCAJJ_bFQZa02MCJMPdX7=BtL-tPzOj+da6vQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:32:23 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: aCFUGIB20SF5IXFJEjMCjy1f3QU
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqd316puXTvku3hMMGnThOV3JGMbLK_erQJDd6ic-BNJgA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 6MAN Working group last call: draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
To: "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/3IzDRASxw9upcNG_ghDWgpc2cz8>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:32:52 -0000

At Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:25:01 +0900,
"Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com> wrote:

> I removed Section 6 of Implementation Considerations according to your
> suggestion.
> The new version is:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis-10

When I said removing Section 6, I meant the couple of leading
paragraphs in the section before Section 6.1, i.e.,

from

   Note:  This non-normative section gives some hints for implementing
      the processing of the RDNSS and DNSSL options in an IPv6 host.

to

   [...]  Whenever there is an expired entry in the DNS Repository, the
   daemon can delete the corresponding entry from the Resolver
   Repository.

I didn't mean removing Section 6.x, and I'm not even sure if it's a
good idea.  We'd certainly revise the first sentence of Section 6.1:

   For DNS repository management, the kernel or user-space process
   (depending on where RAs are processed) should maintain two data
   structures: (i) DNS Server List that keeps the list of RDNSS

so it will be independent from kernel vs user-space considerations,
but the rest of this section rather seems to be describing the general
protocol handling using some conceptual data structures.  They don't
necessarily have to be removed in the context of this discussion, and
I guess they can actually be an important part of this document.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya