Re: 6MAN Working group last call: draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis

["Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <[e-mail]>]

Jinmei,
I will reflect your comments on the revision by modifying the sentence
mentioned below and getting back Section 6.x's.

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Paul
2016. 3. 15. 오전 1:32에 "神明達哉" <[e-mail]>님이 작성:

> At Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:25:01 +0900,
> "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> > I removed Section 6 of Implementation Considerations according to your
> > suggestion.
> > The new version is:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis-10
>
> When I said removing Section 6, I meant the couple of leading
> paragraphs in the section before Section 6.1, i.e.,
>
> from
>
>    Note:  This non-normative section gives some hints for implementing
>       the processing of the RDNSS and DNSSL options in an IPv6 host.
>
> to
>
>    [...]  Whenever there is an expired entry in the DNS Repository, the
>    daemon can delete the corresponding entry from the Resolver
>    Repository.
>
> I didn't mean removing Section 6.x, and I'm not even sure if it's a
> good idea.  We'd certainly revise the first sentence of Section 6.1:
>
>    For DNS repository management, the kernel or user-space process
>    (depending on where RAs are processed) should maintain two data
>    structures: (i) DNS Server List that keeps the list of RDNSS
>
> so it will be independent from kernel vs user-space considerations,
> but the rest of this section rather seems to be describing the general
> protocol handling using some conceptual data structures.  They don't
> necessarily have to be removed in the context of this discussion, and
> I guess they can actually be an important part of this document.
>
> --
> JINMEI, Tatuya
>