IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 6MAN Working group last call: draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Fri, 11 March 2016 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3754812D8F3 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:32:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.35
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.35 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K-Cy0vO7MON0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:32:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22f.google.com (mail-ig0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0691C12D8F2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:32:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id z8so15422080ige.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:32:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=5+x1e9FkOYQwcqht+5hkGwRVpbZd8lrMdmHKAmjc8lA=; b=t4HgDn5Rafc44g4YWdDeS/f04Mtssq9LqG6+oi6NYEpuGiaK6eD+n4mnZBC9mxqrFA 0ATqTLRa/D2O7ol0UHOLulOh0qfmjVOxm0ppb1fqe4oxWKTlsRLoGEW9vimVUcNB2+JA ikLI0L9BcAAR63ph4k99YyTXQ8VDeMFYvRC2BYB2yBIo7xTdM9vLAgLqoAMrzvrUyryl 5+YAC0VinX94SmIEk6ZjMCNhqr4G0MiyBkGYQMkjP5P3mI/OO2LFvQY0/Qwb+K+mjfY/ aniE5Z7h+QHrTZrYyXkHjZe/MZB5OCUI9TpoFkQe1AnjHELNaKx9pHVCE66MPw7g8y6W Vj4w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=5+x1e9FkOYQwcqht+5hkGwRVpbZd8lrMdmHKAmjc8lA=; b=YEbnGiIhA1tB5sthDZXUWFBtDsGa56tXg3qyZp21EsbbHkMHYSIanrT2hQvZG98uBa 6h4YliFmfqTt+5Q+ZZAmhiamh1/Vo8UfWWzskAF8epg7rXnBPY9bnhxfXSXqHGwWZ6qd zJjIVBeI9II4c6GROF9quyx9MS2779LeA9+EvRmhdyA0GYPE2lItMBkMU/DyKBnHULNn W6+TmHPYWfiQNLfnTBiU2ZfRQxq0+WGsEnUx7DDmUyhke0EwMLNjD8+qMP/xB7kf7oAr dvlwWhX8RO4gJzLtweUHIgjftTwBEq4UxfOHvE6Xeppw4RyjEc5gDjVOovaxri0rr0po pswA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJI01mRwMyJ87YDy5D9o6oXSRxqObENdOuK+qiYxhktQzJAe07BSTrA+CKLOOkmgJD8TdEhPiEJquI2sKw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.97.71 with SMTP id dy7mr4850874igb.78.1457713970393; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:32:50 -0800 (PST)
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.56.136 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:32:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <517ACBE4-46C3-40C7-86E5-5906309E6BA9@employees.org>
References: <6AC58C26-01B6-4C16-851F-0C1228CDD2AF@employees.org> <CAJE_bqfvE0jGoRi2X=ohpqsXmGx9AVKnjeGH-P8zWp6=3_kbVA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPK2DewJ0uF9i_uaKLCn5gM_KGm2uv5B0a2VFm7cmNNn5acQPQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqcetbtgsje4TqCpUF+zoUL19RHjWj2-xg+N39i8XodDVQ@mail.gmail.com> <517ACBE4-46C3-40C7-86E5-5906309E6BA9@employees.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:32:50 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: y5tirkBP2NBuI6koRX3FrUyKoBg
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqfeLxURYwMDcjMtSnyb2WBeYu_5Yq_2Yyo_O9sqHRn+og@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 6MAN Working group last call: draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/JqbRCkGFWHM18OOhyskYAMxj8NU>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 16:32:56 -0000

At Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:11:58 +0100,
otroan@employees.org wrote:

> I would in general prefer not to see implementation specific text or
> text on specific implementation issues in a protocol specification.

That's perfectly fine to me, and in that sense I'd rather suggest just
removing Section 6.  My suggestion was not to provide new
implementation-specific text; it was a suggestion to (IMO) improve
already existing such text.

> I don't think any discussion on kernel vs user space belongs.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email