IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 6MAN Working group last call: draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis

otroan@employees.org Sat, 12 March 2016 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F346212D6C6 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 08:55:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=employees.org; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=otroan@employees.org header.d=employees.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ErBK1ZQ6e70c for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 08:55:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cowbell.employees.org (cowbell.employees.org [IPv6:2001:1868:a000:17::142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3D1912D5BF for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 08:55:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cowbell.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764CCD789D; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 08:55:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id :references:to; s=selector1; bh=3dF1v95w5jRdYqYaHdWmPL1i8SY=; b= Ynh+CxB/ActUf33ljEOLGTBE4SHgxDnfLhH6i+gGAKBR2wkXRMB9iZr5vsIhxSmb yALD1vutdKnJqSNg61Th1RVW7a1+9J1bWqHYnyR+7JdHf1gfsrMWrgNkH8VFSKtm rouAme+V/FgELUai0dhpXBi/pr5QXLl1/DRY7Hc982A=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id :references:to; q=dns; s=selector1; b=HaI81bQFieFanYDAv88bR2dmpA TmLpBuje8BKrfR1ZVpo0hOcJkY71MLUJjf3yjglJaYr+R6UOJPRDT9idlbYUaI+J V4H/JaDRP3kT/CrbLQy7wUC47uyZe2WF6Vidm5D4Dvp6d85jYDszlRCBC+jK0LW6 We7UjlxLq+qonbMI4=
Received: from h.hanazo.no (46.66.160.197.tmi.telenormobil.no [46.66.160.197]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: otroan) by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 232AAD7882; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 08:55:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by h.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6AF1285D52; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 17:55:09 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: 6MAN Working group last call: draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BABA6993-731F-4BCC-9DD7-3BF189416EE1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
From: otroan@employees.org
In-Reply-To: <CAJE_bqfeLxURYwMDcjMtSnyb2WBeYu_5Yq_2Yyo_O9sqHRn+og@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 17:55:09 +0100
Message-Id: <73EEC8CE-EDC8-45FC-AE4F-F390F965304F@employees.org>
References: <6AC58C26-01B6-4C16-851F-0C1228CDD2AF@employees.org> <CAJE_bqfvE0jGoRi2X=ohpqsXmGx9AVKnjeGH-P8zWp6=3_kbVA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPK2DewJ0uF9i_uaKLCn5gM_KGm2uv5B0a2VFm7cmNNn5acQPQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqcetbtgsje4TqCpUF+zoUL19RHjWj2-xg+N39i8XodDVQ@mail.gmail.com> <517ACBE4-46C3-40C7-86E5-5906309E6BA9@employees.org> <CAJE_bqfeLxURYwMDcjMtSnyb2WBeYu_5Yq_2Yyo_O9sqHRn+og@mail.gmail.com>
To: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/S-L8OUxSM1q9ahpY2jyiXgwRIEI>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 16:55:15 -0000

Jinmei,

>> I would in general prefer not to see implementation specific text or
>> text on specific implementation issues in a protocol specification.
> 
> That's perfectly fine to me, and in that sense I'd rather suggest just
> removing Section 6.  My suggestion was not to provide new
> implementation-specific text; it was a suggestion to (IMO) improve
> already existing such text.

Ah yes, sorry about that Jinmei.
Yes, I would also be supportive of removing section 6.

Best regards,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email