Re: Interested in wireless ?

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 01 June 2020 19:12 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13823A14D9; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 12:12:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HOjlY5onE3hI; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 12:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C32063A14D3; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 12:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 051JCUIi040063; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 21:12:30 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 92A1D200F6A; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 21:12:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84244200B3D; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 21:12:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.11.240.31] ([10.11.240.31]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 051JCUBF000552; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 21:12:30 +0200
Subject: Re: Interested in wireless ?
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <A26FA9F8-72B8-4728-B978-6DDD271EC64D@cisco.com>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <c0b383ce-9a86-dbe1-30a3-f96e7434c2a6@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 21:12:30 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A26FA9F8-72B8-4728-B978-6DDD271EC64D@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/MNPQvSGjAF-B24vjxu5S4AQxB8I>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 19:12:35 -0000

draft says:
>    The routers send RAs with a SLLAO at a regular period.  The period
>    can be indicated in the RA-Interval Option [RFC6275].  If available,
>    the message can be transported in a compressed form in a beacon,
>    e.g., in OCB Basic Safety Messages (BSM) that are nominally sent
>    every 100ms.

I suggest to give CAM as an example as well, not just BSM.

It might be that on some continent CAM is more important than BSM.

It might be, that in an ideal world where all use Internet, there is 
just one CAMBSM message, and maybe we get to that if we put it on IP.

But until then, citing just BSM is not good enough.

Alex


Le 30/05/2020 à 13:46, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) a écrit :
> Dear all
> 
> Since there’s so much energy on the list these days, could we consider 
> the adoption of
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-6man-ipv6-over-wireless-05
> ?
> 
> I got only positive feedback, there’s no politics, there no label, it’s 
> all about IPv6 models for wireless. This may appear useful in a world 
> where the vast majority of devices are connected that way.
> 
> Keep safe,
> 
> Pascal
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>