Re: [IPv6] I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.txt

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Fri, 16 February 2024 23:35 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 022A2C14F5E5 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 15:35:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O-CspSswrlof for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 15:35:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oa1-x2b.google.com (mail-oa1-x2b.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::2b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F7B4C14CF1B for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 15:33:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oa1-x2b.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2046b2cd2d3so1973883fac.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 15:33:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1708126428; x=1708731228; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=XYmHB3ciWmt01JCW5Oq9jgAK1AOhmxzvYvePnmVVYmQ=; b=GS459Qm9b7ufjMoLWAa4g3p5uh2Y2672F4b9FZ5lr3JboraLPFLTVLnVj6aAvfHn8u DDeg3mToa0chIRWexM5U7fllZ5goYL4yq/8360iKxeor+lNGH3Z0LTCdtWjTXKOUR1Pm rMo8N41hCFMw0W4/0HxL9MaWX5pp8JE3HbAnuAWG/wuz9i1AKudLXmjWk0GN2TTdcVZH giyUH75/e/wXMxb8duMPoxFwh+Kh/eHCair3WYmk/EkdPeOj8vk5Z5R2lPARLQj3DOeT Xl8h+0s26uxkaIYLpjDF3WghJ8/taGtDI+xa3CMwbp/25USDkSJUfgXBLToFDGFY1ymZ y7Gg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708126428; x=1708731228; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XYmHB3ciWmt01JCW5Oq9jgAK1AOhmxzvYvePnmVVYmQ=; b=uad8NZReVeWidjVzOot6G3+mVKxlTtyPFFMwycdQWceETeMPIH+YKcopOyQ5AyKz8i CzHpSxMwUM9BVbqcOeT9TBYhzciKeQOMP8MNg4JaIHL0cztoLEe71F2zmrKf9bqs52Ba neMQpERZJ1NZcjMeYaymJNaQ+qnExVfqMTRVebh5QL0XuG5G/GtKasJPmQvh3zWLicGj ee9MQyItAOVlAyU8rn5Otth1JA4Vems+DLP1atsK2AWL0wKZZ/LuBYDDPpvFKR3PwBpc 6811/EgxdN57T9UI8L3lzj/VDX7co8/3U8JU4fs3qcQSp7V9fC0KaTgcbToyUFHVRZ3N R+cw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVPVZf3uTT4FFn9y+IA4a52v/uNSYZFvfMbO73EswT43b+yG3XNZamg4mRXv1EHcSlqMPd38B0EXRi9X4Q7
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyK2gdUXdezGTzHEHUt1QibP1QUOE6m4gmUbHQXrGyOFhJvYjtP zqW3FPx4v5HLnCEt2DmPea1HPmeXDneCUKfg8vIJtHLmOhUclkr6Q8e5PEdi
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHet0lqUj7q79Mdu3ybxPQkEQI0SrZOru5GBirMZWCyQunyvd6ULt7IYAAiqYnYzpA5AHauUA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:b28b:b0:21e:698f:5c87 with SMTP id c11-20020a056870b28b00b0021e698f5c87mr3508008oao.50.1708126427962; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 15:33:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (136-25-188-92.cab.webpass.net. [136.25.188.92]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p13-20020a635b0d000000b005d66caee3d0sm443885pgb.22.2024.02.16.15.33.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Feb 2024 15:33:47 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <aec26843-b672-2206-c4cd-ea6ae4d50976@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 15:33:26 -0800
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <56694AD5-70F7-4970-9ED4-02BF3160B2F1@gmail.com>
References: <170534827865.59933.11111230460163352539@ietfa.amsl.com> <2767dad8-0b85-16c6-0dfb-124a2c977675@gmail.com> <CABNhwV1jQD5pizF_9H3n7n+hU=rFDs_Qx7yw8OCyT1hEF2H6ng@mail.gmail.com> <5561c863-179a-8de8-5e15-7509f818550f@gmail.com> <8AB5A2E9-D893-4551-9291-9F2EB28D7908@cisco.com> <48f81e14-1a8a-888d-43c8-db54de2f94fc@gmail.com> <B7AD89D9-271C-408A-AB63-EEE6863D9628@cisco.com> <511c7735-fffa-94be-1a40-b7e5564ab7ba@gmail.com> <D0B561DD-56F7-449C-9822-385763A2D15D@gmail.com> <aec26843-b672-2206-c4cd-ea6ae4d50976@gmail.com>
To: Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/WX8IcruxVqJhtZjDxh-XSeRzljU>
Subject: Re: [IPv6] I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 23:35:53 -0000


> On Feb 16, 2024, at 11:11 AM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 17-Feb-24 03:20, Bob Hinden wrote:
>> Brian, Eric,
>>> On Feb 15, 2024, at 7:43 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 16-Feb-24 10:56, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
>>>> With my IESG hat on and without any relationship to this specific case.
>>>> This will probably be challenging for an informational I-D to obsolete a proposed standard I-D.
>>>> At the worst case, have 2 documents: one obsoleting the old proposed standard then an informational one. Ugly tough...
>>>> But, Brian, I am sure you know the processes even better than I ;-)
>>> 
>>> I'm fairly sure there is no documented rule for this, but a little Python script told me that the only precedent is RFC1574 and RFC1575, which *both* obsoleted the same Proposed Standard.
>>> 
>>> However, I think we can figure out a way round this if we want.
>> Perhaps we could have a single standards track document that obsoletes RFC 6874, and also includes the “aspirational” text without using any RFC2119 language.
> 
> I was thinking along those lines, but I have a slight preference for leaving one SHOULD in place, thus:
> 
> OLD:
> A user interface (UI) that allows or requires the user to enter an IPv6 address MUST provide a means for entering a link-local address...
> 
> NEW:
> A user interface (UI) that allows or requires the user to enter an IPv6 address SHOULD provide a means for entering a link-local address...

Fine by me.

Bob


> 
>   Brian
> 
>> Bob
>>> 
>>>    Brian
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> -éric
>>>> On 15/02/2024, 20:42, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> Éric,
>>>> Thanks. With your AD hat partially on, do you think that an Informational document can request the IESG to obsolete a Proposed Standard?
>>>> If so, I'd personally be happy to make this draft informational and change the RFC2119 keywords to plain English. That would clarify that it is, as David Schinazi says, aspirational.
>>>> Regards
>>>> Brian
>>>> On 15-Feb-24 22:15, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
>>>>> [Top posting and without any special hat]
>>>>> 
>>>>> Brian and Bob, this is a good idea to move forward and keep this valuable feature of IPv6: LLA
>>>>> 
>>>>> Like David S, I do not think that this is the IETF remit to specify UI though, i.e., an informational document seems more adequate to me (again as individual).
>>>>> 
>>>>> BTW, I often enter URLs without a keyboard with 1- or 2-dimension QR code. Should this be part of the I-D as well ? (more complex than having 2 boxes to enter data) as QR codes are often printed on stickers on IoT devices
>>>>> 
>>>>> Just my 0,01 EUR
>>>>> 
>>>>> -éric
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 12/02/2024, 23:15, "ipv6 on behalf of Brian E Carpenter" <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> <mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Were there any other comments on this draft? Are there people who disagree with this new approach? If not, is it appropriate to consider WG adoption already?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Brian Carpenter
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 26-Jan-24 14:01, Gyan Mishra wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I read the draft and it looks good and makes sense.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> <http://www.verizon.com/> <http://www.verizon.com/&gt;> <http://www.verizon.com/&gt;> <http://www.verizon.com/&amp;gt;&gt;>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> *Gyan Mishra*
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> /Network Solutions A//rchitect /
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> /Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com> <mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>> <mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com> <mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>>>//
>>>>>> /
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> /M 301 502-1347
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> /
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 2:58 PM Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>> <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> As the WG may have noticed, draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis has been stuck in the IESG since March 2023, despite multiple revisions and discussions with the ADs and other objectors, particularly those in the W3C and browser (WHATWG**) communities.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We (Brian and Bob) have reluctantly concluded that the disconnects on this topic between the IETF, the W3C and WHATWG are such that an acceptable compromise cannot be reached.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We therefore propose to transform the discussion by withdrawing rfc6874bis and RFC6874, and replacing them by a generic requirement that when a user interface supports the input of IPv6 addresses, it MUST support the input of link-local addresses with interface IDs (a.k.a. zone IDs). How any particular software tool does this is a choice for its implementer.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> A first draft has just been submitted, please comment. It intentionally makes no reference whatever to browser or other web issues.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Brian Carpenter
>>>>>> Bob Hinden
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>>>>> Subject: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.txt
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 11:51:18 -0800
>>>>>> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>> <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>>>
>>>>>> Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>> <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>>>
>>>>>> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org> <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>> <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org> <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Internet-Draft draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.txt is now available.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Title: Entering IPv6 Zone Identifiers in User Interfaces
>>>>>> Authors: Brian Carpenter
>>>>>> Robert M. Hinden
>>>>>> Name: draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.txt
>>>>>> Pages: 7
>>>>>> Dates: 2024-01-15
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Abstract:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This document describes how the zone identifier of an IPv6 scoped
>>>>>> address, defined in the IPv6 Scoped Address Architecture (RFC 4007),
>>>>>> should be entered into a user interface. It obsoletes RFC 6874.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Discussion Venue
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Discussion of this document takes place on the 6MAN mailing list
>>>>>> (ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org> <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>> <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org> <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>>>), which is archived at
>>>>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/&gt;> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/&gt;> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/&gt;> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/&amp;gt;&gt;>
>>>>>> (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/&gt;> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/&gt;> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/&gt;> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/&amp;gt;&gt;>).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
>>>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui/> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui/> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui/&gt;> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui/> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui/&gt;> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui/&gt;> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui/&amp;gt;&gt;>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There is also an HTML version available at:
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.html <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.html> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.html> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.html&gt;> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.html> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.html&gt;> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.html&gt;> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.html&amp;gt;&gt;>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
>>>>>> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> I-D-Announce mailing list
>>>>>> I-D-Announce@ietf.org <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org> <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org>> <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org> <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org>>>
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce&gt;> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce&gt;> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce&gt;> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce&amp;gt;&gt;>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>>>>> ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org> <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>> <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org> <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>>>
>>>>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6&gt;> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6&gt;> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6&gt;> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6&amp;gt;&gt;>
>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> 
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>>>> ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org> <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>>
>>>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6&gt;>
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>> ipv6@ietf.org
>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------