Re: [IPv6] I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.txt

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Fri, 16 February 2024 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E98C14F5F9 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 06:21:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yUuUazZG6OO0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 06:21:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A41A8C14F70C for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 06:21:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-dcd94fb9e4dso2053168276.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 06:21:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1708093276; x=1708698076; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=d1bbGP2B4M3su2PEKemb/czc42gEEnVAW0wZ1qej7lI=; b=SLWjkNnmCuH9gFRTlTyOf6yTeBDzyxdWvdkyRuCQeUiIfCQMVex31mjvyLgKKnBnhH ypmYDjQwnP8l67GHuCq6aUbq3rZduYym4XuWcmekPnJNBphUuscYNWp9O4M68s1L/UmO rLs2+6zhMHPkchS9niXj4yn/msDyrZD/PQuHkUnQfniROb56/cj9Ozr+l8Jc84EICskz C4WxV8qqYCkzYxJi3PWtJyLK/jZDCwvMVVi1pEWvBSqnUzSTk4VVToD9ONoXMkZ7JNZ9 nrnaDf0f63reXYKSnk4FiFyCk3GetmmrTWb6rnohmRlpbxg9DD5eyrfcTPHpNKCsedSy cS4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708093276; x=1708698076; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=d1bbGP2B4M3su2PEKemb/czc42gEEnVAW0wZ1qej7lI=; b=RuHjWwKMT+vbVdFHEzi3kokua/cqfcn8lbKVICjuoc2fLuHwW2TQqfd5bfX3tSqBN+ dg0YIEOTnZ/JyrGyjfpUBrKfYAoY29HBENF0SjUFz5fEMGTjeU5hOa1h/33mo49IKyvf FfoABXdizHfGAPYn/u2wwDDELbpAXtMubCzeHHTuwH7obXuPVDYT7vp34bQq3krFOXoD 1lbkpBTWogUArh93g6bNmDeGK8i6bPFnh2siHhKGvF2gf8rmv74tFjSuNck/gXvLQoBZ tWfAwWZ19FiFEsGuO4+abDhL2aS+W3H1pf0+A0iAw/O/JcyewTQpvfiurXkOnqniXhBy 8CgQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWiGiFIISjdeHQMP+6Q8Hu3OBNYt6n1qyYGfi3N+tVE8sotFRYQ1HlW8xmU9xFmZvgQft8BiGYe7pbmLneu
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwJfwcxeHAMq4IeTR4gb8t622SGHI3vyHrKAKskUARQdztHwEPK bpE/kCdG5bNayvK2xU6V4qyQwvaWy120vQHwZBynezD2ptuAVFSF+Gz4S+yf
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH7/wvB261GLyJb8XPRDT+s44HpY2/ERRsx2f4dIfKJkr8Cosrce2WfSsljN/f9cwCBRNFioA==
X-Received: by 2002:a25:8d0d:0:b0:dcb:ef22:3869 with SMTP id n13-20020a258d0d000000b00dcbef223869mr4569285ybl.16.1708093275667; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 06:21:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (99-31-208-116.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [99.31.208.116]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i126-20020a256d84000000b00dcd25ce965esm327090ybc.41.2024.02.16.06.21.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Feb 2024 06:21:15 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <511c7735-fffa-94be-1a40-b7e5564ab7ba@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 06:20:53 -0800
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D0B561DD-56F7-449C-9822-385763A2D15D@gmail.com>
References: <170534827865.59933.11111230460163352539@ietfa.amsl.com> <2767dad8-0b85-16c6-0dfb-124a2c977675@gmail.com> <CABNhwV1jQD5pizF_9H3n7n+hU=rFDs_Qx7yw8OCyT1hEF2H6ng@mail.gmail.com> <5561c863-179a-8de8-5e15-7509f818550f@gmail.com> <8AB5A2E9-D893-4551-9291-9F2EB28D7908@cisco.com> <48f81e14-1a8a-888d-43c8-db54de2f94fc@gmail.com> <B7AD89D9-271C-408A-AB63-EEE6863D9628@cisco.com> <511c7735-fffa-94be-1a40-b7e5564ab7ba@gmail.com>
To: Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Yzd7Wb9V4cYzMc2yULBwqNdVzBU>
Subject: Re: [IPv6] I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 14:21:37 -0000

Brian, Eric,

> On Feb 15, 2024, at 7:43 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 16-Feb-24 10:56, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
>> With my IESG hat on and without any relationship to this specific case.
>> This will probably be challenging for an informational I-D to obsolete a proposed standard I-D.
>> At the worst case, have 2 documents: one obsoleting the old proposed standard then an informational one. Ugly tough...
>> But, Brian, I am sure you know the processes even better than I ;-)
> 
> I'm fairly sure there is no documented rule for this, but a little Python script told me that the only precedent is RFC1574 and RFC1575, which *both* obsoleted the same Proposed Standard.
> 
> However, I think we can figure out a way round this if we want.

Perhaps we could have a single standards track document that obsoletes RFC 6874, and also includes the “aspirational” text without using any RFC2119 language.  

Bob


> 
>    Brian
> 
> 
>> -éric
>> On 15/02/2024, 20:42, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Éric,
>> Thanks. With your AD hat partially on, do you think that an Informational document can request the IESG to obsolete a Proposed Standard?
>> If so, I'd personally be happy to make this draft informational and change the RFC2119 keywords to plain English. That would clarify that it is, as David Schinazi says, aspirational.
>> Regards
>> Brian
>> On 15-Feb-24 22:15, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
>>> [Top posting and without any special hat]
>>> 
>>> Brian and Bob, this is a good idea to move forward and keep this valuable feature of IPv6: LLA
>>> 
>>> Like David S, I do not think that this is the IETF remit to specify UI though, i.e., an informational document seems more adequate to me (again as individual).
>>> 
>>> BTW, I often enter URLs without a keyboard with 1- or 2-dimension QR code. Should this be part of the I-D as well ? (more complex than having 2 boxes to enter data) as QR codes are often printed on stickers on IoT devices
>>> 
>>> Just my 0,01 EUR
>>> 
>>> -éric
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 12/02/2024, 23:15, "ipv6 on behalf of Brian E Carpenter" <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> <mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Were there any other comments on this draft? Are there people who disagree with this new approach? If not, is it appropriate to consider WG adoption already?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> Brian Carpenter
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 26-Jan-24 14:01, Gyan Mishra wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I read the draft and it looks good and makes sense.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> <http://www.verizon.com/> <http://www.verizon.com/&gt;> <http://www.verizon.com/&gt;> <http://www.verizon.com/&amp;gt;&gt;>
>>>> 
>>>> *Gyan Mishra*
>>>> 
>>>> /Network Solutions A//rchitect /
>>>> 
>>>> /Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com> <mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>> <mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com> <mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>>>//
>>>> /
>>>> 
>>>> /M 301 502-1347
>>>> 
>>>> /
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 2:58 PM Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>> <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> As the WG may have noticed, draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis has been stuck in the IESG since March 2023, despite multiple revisions and discussions with the ADs and other objectors, particularly those in the W3C and browser (WHATWG**) communities.
>>>> 
>>>> We (Brian and Bob) have reluctantly concluded that the disconnects on this topic between the IETF, the W3C and WHATWG are such that an acceptable compromise cannot be reached.
>>>> 
>>>> We therefore propose to transform the discussion by withdrawing rfc6874bis and RFC6874, and replacing them by a generic requirement that when a user interface supports the input of IPv6 addresses, it MUST support the input of link-local addresses with interface IDs (a.k.a. zone IDs). How any particular software tool does this is a choice for its implementer.
>>>> 
>>>> A first draft has just been submitted, please comment. It intentionally makes no reference whatever to browser or other web issues.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards
>>>> Brian Carpenter
>>>> Bob Hinden
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>>> Subject: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.txt
>>>> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 11:51:18 -0800
>>>> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>> <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>>>
>>>> Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>> <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>>>
>>>> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org> <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>> <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org> <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>>>
>>>> 
>>>> Internet-Draft draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.txt is now available.
>>>> 
>>>> Title: Entering IPv6 Zone Identifiers in User Interfaces
>>>> Authors: Brian Carpenter
>>>> Robert M. Hinden
>>>> Name: draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.txt
>>>> Pages: 7
>>>> Dates: 2024-01-15
>>>> 
>>>> Abstract:
>>>> 
>>>> This document describes how the zone identifier of an IPv6 scoped
>>>> address, defined in the IPv6 Scoped Address Architecture (RFC 4007),
>>>> should be entered into a user interface. It obsoletes RFC 6874.
>>>> 
>>>> Discussion Venue
>>>> 
>>>> This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.
>>>> 
>>>> Discussion of this document takes place on the 6MAN mailing list
>>>> (ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org> <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>> <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org> <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>>>), which is archived at
>>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/&gt;> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/&gt;> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/&gt;> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/&amp;gt;&gt;>
>>>> (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/&gt;> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/&gt;> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/&gt;> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/&amp;gt;&gt;>).
>>>> 
>>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui/> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui/> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui/&gt;> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui/> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui/&gt;> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui/&gt;> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui/&amp;gt;&gt;>
>>>> 
>>>> There is also an HTML version available at:
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.html <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.html> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.html> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.html&gt;> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.html> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.html&gt;> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.html&gt;> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-6man-zone-ui-00.html&amp;gt;&gt;>
>>>> 
>>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
>>>> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> I-D-Announce mailing list
>>>> I-D-Announce@ietf.org <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org> <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org>> <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org> <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org>>>
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce&gt;> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce&gt;> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce&gt;> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce&amp;gt;&gt;>
>>>> 
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>>> ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org> <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>> <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org> <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>>>
>>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6&gt;> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6&gt;> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6&gt;> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6&amp;gt;&gt;>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>>> ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org> <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>>
>>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6&gt;>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------