Re: topics to circulate
Erik Kline <ek@loon.com> Wed, 11 December 2019 05:35 UTC
Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB11A1200FD for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 21:35:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=loon.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dHDglTBOyCQZ for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 21:35:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb32.google.com (mail-yb1-xb32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F76812002F for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 21:35:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb32.google.com with SMTP id o22so8603823ybg.6 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 21:35:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=loon.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=VfeM6GgsQCnigqjJlrTrLZCVSvE17nP+yNNIla9hlQA=; b=OAbenVfZnuDaOIdDywJEhPaDS+IuBJoCYNvSBmU/2KeWuj1gfp5yIXdqIt6IScNAPQ SDGyOU0UjpPv1GOQ0g4kQoF0zLQfya/MpJEoY5arRve2UWdjAUakL9CpMDid0EnZKj3h i4bVPLQpVQq6RThQ3GqJuFPANKk2y2NuPFmeM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VfeM6GgsQCnigqjJlrTrLZCVSvE17nP+yNNIla9hlQA=; b=lw7G6tlca51tukhE2ZDh+3X7VFEE2TX6YxMFn3dtjbsXbMwBWZyPEIzg6KBLWHrG82 EIGQm1MpONDcjoEup60DPsJ2wNdDeli5kNaCjNzOfABYzoOCSymPZHx6UQ0JUFIB18S1 YOQ8XLXSE4IuCc5bLhplidPqjZcxesWwTTVyU9PN4MFKskOWmYR5LpLVFCE4l8QxoPW+ 3kL3qpjg0Z9i69yGI3c9NuvzC/uLeEyPYn3Y+ONax1ZMdi5nWKfocGGEQPUl20M2iP8V GzJh1fseMBFndBxL/bUeA5iM69OhCQcCCo0Mq7wxU/l2bcV9XipELBqpYj1jp9JYwpmG /W2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW0q1IPzw2Ia77LGuBzl+BAii02S1VjeEpw3wZhoG+dl1W+q5/5 PBD4ngG+uxfGVVMAqijzyl9lg77GxE1vqi9Zzgn/Aw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy5hnP/fcUjM5C1RUB1EHAM7r7aAAyIOSqvZo3Cd6WzvK0DLxZpckBDvO/eJhSORiupSsMBOdZBKbE4rkVp5sM=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:c044:: with SMTP id c65mr1326606ybf.257.1576042552937; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 21:35:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BN7PR05MB5699EA5F4C041538560282A6AE5F0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <52132FA9-669E-4B32-BDC8-6F06C98315F3@gmail.com> <CALx6S37r2JYbrMpN-qR3bD3kaOMj3xEceQC5JhVb8dqVzfq=5A@mail.gmail.com> <06B50938-0FC6-4901-9531-CC0385185F13@employees.org> <2e69cf4e-d166-80ef-eb9e-ab8a941c60a0@gmail.com> <CABNhwV30z1_kXjtnAzV6_nAvo9H=E8miCnokcgmG-uPKKkRCdg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABNhwV30z1_kXjtnAzV6_nAvo9H=E8miCnokcgmG-uPKKkRCdg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: ek@loon.com
From: Erik Kline <ek@loon.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 21:35:41 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAedzxp+G6XwSY4wCA7vH8t9bim+5M4Qsh2LuuxF4P=xO9xg6g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: topics to circulate
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, "Mudric, Dusan (Dusan)" <dmudric@avaya.com>, IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008539e20599670072"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/cHlzV-uWgmUtkTn1889FzaT41qA>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 05:35:56 -0000
I've been assuming Ole was joking. On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 20:58, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you Alex!! > > The leadership are you referring to Co chairs Bob & Ole and AD Warren > Kumari. > > Did you mention the 64 bit boundary that we are working on a SLAAC draft? > > Where is the meeting being held? > > I will try to attend if I can. > > As far as the draft I will get the section added that Dusan mentioned as > soon as I get a chance. Also try to finish the RFC href cleanup. > > I think maybe after that meeting would be a good time to shoot for to > finalize and submit the draft. > > Also we will get a good feeling or not of positive feedback on the slaac > change. > > I am part of 14 different WG’s hard to imagine so the IETF keeps me pretty > busy along with my full time job along with consulting and of course > personal life. > > Not enough hours in a day!!😊 > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 4:36 AM Alexandre Petrescu < > alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> Le 06/12/2019 à 18:06, otroan@employees.org a écrit : >> [...] >> > >> > The leadership has tasked us with circulating the discussions between >> the following topics: >> > - 64 bit boundary >> > - M/O bits >> > - ULA or not ULA >> > - Extension headers >> > - Defining new mechanisms for IID formats >> >> This list of topics to circulate through deserves to be set aside. >> >> > There is a scheduled switch to the M/O bits topic in mid January. >> > Please continue to the good work on EH in the meantime. >> >> It is good to know there is a notion of time schedule for the topics. >> >> Alex >> > -- > > Gyan S. Mishra > > IT Network Engineering & Technology > > Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) > > 13101 Columbia Pike FDC1 3rd Floor > > Silver Spring, MD 20904 > > United States > > Phone: 301 502-1347 <(301)%20502-1347> > > Email: gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com > > www.linkedin.com/in/networking-technologies-consultant > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
- Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping Ron Bonica
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Fernando Gont
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- RE: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Ron Bonica
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Fernando Gont
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… otroan
- RE: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Ron Bonica
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… otroan
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Fernando Gont
- We don't seem to be following our processes (Re: … Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Tom Herbert
- RE: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Ron Bonica
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Enno Rey
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Enno Rey
- RE: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Ron Bonica
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Bob Hinden
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Sander Steffann
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Tom Herbert
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Sander Steffann
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Robert Raszuk
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Bob Hinden
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Tom Herbert
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Andrew Alston
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… otroan
- RE: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Andrew Alston
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… otroan
- RE: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Ron Bonica
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- RE: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Ole Troan
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Andrew Alston
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Sander Steffann
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Tom Herbert
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Tom Herbert
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Ole Troan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Separating issues (was Re: [spring] We don't seem… Suresh Krishnan
- RE: Separating issues (was Re: [spring] We don't … Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Mark Smith
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Robert Raszuk
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Tom Herbert
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Tom Herbert
- Re: [spring] Network Programming - Penultimate Se… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Mark Smith
- IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Fernando Gont
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Sander Steffann
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Joel M. Halpern
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Tom Herbert
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Sander Steffann
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Warren Kumari
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- RE: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Ron Bonica
- RE: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Ron Bonica
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Sander Steffann
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- RE: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Ron Bonica
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- RE: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… bruno.decraene
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Fernando Gont
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Tom Herbert
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Fernando Gont
- RE: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Ron Bonica
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Fernando Gont
- Re: topics to circulate Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: topics to circulate Gyan Mishra
- Re: topics to circulate Erik Kline
- Re: topics to circulate Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: topics to circulate Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Alexandre Petrescu