Re: 6MAN WG Adoption call : draft-jeong-6man-rdnss-rfc6106-bis

Hi 6MAN WG,
Here is the revised draft reflecting the discussion of link-local addresses
for recursive DNS servers:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis-03

The major changes are as follows:

5.1.  Recursive DNS Server Option
...
Note:  The addresses for recursive DNS servers in the RDNSS option
      MAY be link-local addresses.  Such link-local addresses SHOULD be
      registered into the resolver repository along with the
      corresponding interfaces (or zones) that received the RDNSS
      option(s) for them.  The interface names (or zone indices) SHOULD
      be represented in the textual format for scoped addresses in
      described in [RFC4007].  When a resolver sends a DNS query message
      to an RDNSS with a link-local address, it MUST use the
      corresponding interface.
...

10.1.  Normative References
...
   [RFC4007]        Deering, S., Haberman, B., Jinmei, T., Nordmark, E.,
                    and B. Zill, "IPv6 Scoped Address Architecture",
                    RFC 4007, March 2005.

...

Appendix B.  Changes from RFC 6106
...
 o  The addresses for recursive DNS servers in the RDNSS option can be
      not only global addresses, but also link-local addresses.  The
      link-local addresses for RDNSSes should be specified in the
      resolver repository along with the corresponding interface names
      (or zone indices).
...

If you have comments and concerns on these updates, please let me know.
Otherwise, I believe that we can do WGLC.

Thanks.

Cheers!

Paul

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <
jaehoon.paul@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Lorenzo,
> As the editor, I agree at Lorenzo's comments.
>
> Lorenzo, could you prepare for a text for your proposal about the usage of
> link-local address of RDNSS?
>
> If so, I will reflect yours on the revised one.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Paul
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> So I think any link-local address received in an RA could only be
>>> interpreted as being on the link over which the RA arrived, as the
>>> context of an RA is the link it was sent over.
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6@ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ===========================
> Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D.
> Assistant Professor
> Department of Software
> Sungkyunkwan University
> Office: +82-31-299-4957
> Email: jaehoon.paul@gmail.com, pauljeong@skku.edu
> Personal Homepage: http://cpslab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php
>

-- 
===========================
Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Software
Sungkyunkwan University
Office: +82-31-299-4957
Email: jaehoon.paul@gmail.com, pauljeong@skku.edu
Personal Homepage: http://cpslab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php