IETF Logo Mail Archive

Conclusion: 6MAN WG Adoption call : draft-jeong-6man-rdnss-rfc6106-bis

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Mon, 20 July 2015 07:26 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153AD1A0235 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5RkqaVuEW8Cx for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:26:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (banjo.employees.org [198.137.202.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F2491A017E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C219061D0; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id :references:to; s=selector1; bh=ICfRw3RRD+BXuyS816ndhxVKHvs=; b= N6qjEH6vyqMImwaqMRpQ+EZuHC1VpC+a38vA6V4p4Iur8HpR0U19t+ZBQSBAiO0t WBY3qdv/sGIi1yjB76jUxY2HMffrjLBwpKLBnJzS8GPyXPYYR4G9ar80gLGSbTrL NNlc/E7a86daQe9lyV6+OXGfEYOzQ/IGNcdulWCeIg8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id :references:to; q=dns; s=selector1; b=QrEDSr8KhzBktkJNBmxPR5JHLq JUfh9qcK6YVSShQJMDdomqh6phrFEkBoqk/8Db3sUsR3jqMUj6gzi+qhxFSsEE1b wfIGgFtuHz6GqN+IwLwXPiH6wHWbUNneQW/YnNAwm66K6gSpCCxE3k54usnaY+De EzQzhGs1tsWVOemqg=
Received: from gomlefisk.localdomain (dhcp-89a2.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.137.162]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: otroan) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9380C61CE; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gomlefisk.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F664495472A; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:26:25 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Conclusion: 6MAN WG Adoption call : draft-jeong-6man-rdnss-rfc6106-bis
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_ADDEA41A-9D7B-4BB0-82ED-B5E300E13B70"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <20CE2629-7D40-4B5B-833E-4A401308027F@employees.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:26:24 +0200
Message-Id: <63A148B8-85C1-4E25-B105-6D672F59E17B@employees.org>
References: <20CE2629-7D40-4B5B-833E-4A401308027F@employees.org>
To: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/jSqDPEPtXwLm_QvNJSQfW97lBJE>
Cc: 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:26:28 -0000

The chairs conclude there is a consensus in the 6MAN working to have this draft become a working group draft.  The authors should submit the next version as a 6MAN working group document.

This document update fixes the bug identified by draft-gont-6man-slaac-dns-config-issues-01, and is intended to be a simple update of RFC 6106.  The chairs believe this is a preferred approach as opposed to publishing a new RFC with this small fix.

While we want to restrict changes to the bug identified, issues were brought up during the adoption call which require further working group discussion and consensus.

Thanks,
Bob & Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email