Re: 6MAN WG Adoption call : draft-jeong-6man-rdnss-rfc6106-bis

["Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <[e-mail]>]

David,
I have reflected all of your comments on the revision.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis-04

Thanks.

Paul


On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 4:34 PM, David Farmer <[e-mail]> wrote:

> On 10/5/15 05:30 , Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong wrote:
>
>> Hi 6MAN WG,
>> Here is the revised draft reflecting the discussion of link-local
>> addresses
>> for recursive DNS servers:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis-03
>>
>> The major changes are as follows:
>>
> ...
>
> Those changes all look good to me.  However, I have a few more issues;
>
> 1. The first paragraph of the Introduction says the following;
>
>    The purpose of this document is to standardize an IPv6 Router
>    Advertisement (RA) option for DNS Recursive Server Addresses used for
>    the DNS name resolution in IPv6 hosts.  This RA option was specified
>    in an earlier Experimental specification [RFC5006].  This document is
>    also to define a new RA option for Domain Name Search Lists for an
>    enhanced DNS configuration.  Thus, this document obsoletes [RFC5006],
>    which only defines the RA option for DNS Recursive Server Addresses.
>
> The last two sentences of this paragraph probably need to be rewritten
> consistent with the changes already made to the Abstract .  Here is some
> possible text, use it if you like;
>
>    The purpose of this document is to standardize an IPv6 Router
>    Advertisement (RA) option for DNS Recursive Server Addresses used for
>    the DNS name resolution in IPv6 hosts.  This RA option was originally
>    specified in an earlier Experimental specification [RFC5006].  This
>    document obsoletes [RFC6106], allowing a higher default value of the
>    lifetime of the RA DNS options to avoid the frequent expiry of the
>    options on links with a relatively high rate of packet loss, and
>    additional clarifications, see Appendix B for details.
>
> 2. I'd like to see the Security Considerations section updated with an
> Informational reference regarding "rogue Router Advertisements" [RFC6104].
>
> 3. I think the IANA Considerations section should be updated to request
> the references for these options to be updated to point at this document.
>
>
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters/icmpv6-parameters.xhtml#icmpv6-parameters-5
>
> 4.  The Acknowledgements section is the text originally in RFC6106.  I'm
> assuming this is just an oversight, as I believe several people have made
> comments worthy of acknowledgement for the new document.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> ================================================
> David Farmer               Email: [e-mail]
> Office of Information Technology
> University of Minnesota
> 2218 University Ave SE     Phone: [phone]
> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029  Cell: 1-612-812-9952
> ================================================
>



-- 
===========================
Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Software
Sungkyunkwan University
Office: [phone]
Email: [e-mail], [e-mail]
Personal Homepage: http://cpslab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php