IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 6MAN WG Adoption call : draft-jeong-6man-rdnss-rfc6106-bis

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Tue, 11 August 2015 12:05 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C835F1A88D5 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 05:05:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fSRD9hBA9aIX for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 05:05:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22e.google.com (mail-yk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F30A81A88DA for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 05:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykdt205 with SMTP id t205so83940964ykd.1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 05:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=uF0dfeZZT7CTloMinmkBMYtUATmXP111yU96si8isy4=; b=mLYMCrwthm83gtCVK0nJKyyMu2stcZJ0MvC7CVodXIEX4WW4P+IMSJCgemrfIdBe+p R3w2tlKWoLPk1xwHZyLQ7Lg6fI/ssrLSnVxyoT/ZU3qsJuTumZOkAdynK08ZHakgT2uq Tps/dohraq2gvloJFOi/5xRI3Ll33iFc3XiVY4PP/hh5xYklMKVh8p6dBSkhzZDvZCYU YhkMfKv9tRdav4HCFQYkA5H/pqU69R697aWWHvxrE6C+ek3J887zuP/caQL+kEXdopiA jbnzEA7v16WFRqcFQJG4C2zAbtk2XuArAae2Z1GDnL7bsHaQj42yOKBWB5arpOqJlyg1 jWJQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=uF0dfeZZT7CTloMinmkBMYtUATmXP111yU96si8isy4=; b=CK9JaK1CLkaHN8a6wIHKO8xaApwvliwYC9n6sfX9EFr3T5N5vDqNrNRve+FhGJJxsk 5DgqSG/RzdXL/PacQdn1og2Mr4/sYrFsjKM+JQ6xg47JNuNCqXjWvUb5vYnpAHsellQ9 dcmAL8OuEik1XFg/l+hCfbDK5W/XQudbjaN+JXlWo4WUzflhKgm37eQqMFTk6WtE4UXJ jVM6hUfK0vqtJEpZ7gyVd+IBvPo32l28AkhHxxj47oM5JqXF0BWcCbdJ5RbjOiONlx7C eUWeDJwTEF0w1E29Gm5Dcz9TvAvVnb604dn1ri4o++KVCuvpBsG9kPabW5FGdWfcuE0o jGlw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlW02f2o3Orc+eY7GTyYYoOoIsFaTBtjl3pXl+EMJGfPVeB0lvxdSA4c4FyHF+HOg8PECRd
X-Received: by 10.170.43.87 with SMTP id 84mr26647668ykl.119.1439294749185; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 05:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.116.147 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 05:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2wMNuPe5mmjDx5xG+3GmN-k47gsabiMQX56fiT+Kk-QcA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20CE2629-7D40-4B5B-833E-4A401308027F@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr0aQ8yQR+2GyuVXJS0DrJasmqFz6RLQcodrCW982pNVGA@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2wMNuPe5mmjDx5xG+3GmN-k47gsabiMQX56fiT+Kk-QcA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 21:05:29 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2AJ4+cvPk-XDzuxehCP+Pw-nUngxhaVMYwUvQJDK8ExA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 6MAN WG Adoption call : draft-jeong-6man-rdnss-rfc6106-bis
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1137a35641214c051d07ec1d"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/qnxW2ORuHZdYcppdv-6EFDPEsyU>
Cc: 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:05:51 -0000

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think link-local addresses should be valid for RDNSS options.
> They're valid for applications to use (as per RFC4007), and mean that
> an on-link resolver service would not be impacted by GUA or ULA
> renumbering events.


Saying that link-local addresses are valid seems like a reasonable position
to take, yes. I'd like us to note it explicitly in the document, though.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email