IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 6MAN WG Adoption call : draft-jeong-6man-rdnss-rfc6106-bis

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Wed, 07 October 2015 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93ED51ACCEF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 10:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P2PRHVHGLF7u for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 10:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x229.google.com (mail-io0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F6EC1ACCEC for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 10:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ioiz6 with SMTP id z6so30726345ioi.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 10:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wd2bncup1wX4XLenWxL+1FoqBjNDQmcd4ujTMf1sUqk=; b=revNTWpjWpM9B1M6ry1/Y0ElSJkuJdtMcx49A+2cpZZfR8g0O29HfNI+fc9CNnnBtH bfsePJ2Q8GAqc45SWoNoOpdtDvpLGyhlK6FifHX5UB6URGytAStDhFnAjz9umxgIsMjY R/2M/ej0S+qFtWjITW8WyHxNNg4qUh5X8cyB6hd432j6ZvSV809X5RJLpznDAvYojMTd tkwa+d7+fsruV4fJo0XyvqFFWOPpZOxO8EdDb7vZTwgZpBevUxaScObVqVXs0o5vGQjw NvtwmDJhbsAWM9a5Yi6tjBS5YH8arwKJEUU3Xa2i0wRGjpGO+CUA6qI3HD+sp5FmbE11 FLIA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.132.222 with SMTP id o91mr3770866ioi.172.1444239794016; Wed, 07 Oct 2015 10:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.140.12 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 10:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPK2Dew9yMhbubP3JnuoT-VtAffwG9ZE_k+arupBaHwWetp9KA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20CE2629-7D40-4B5B-833E-4A401308027F@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr0aQ8yQR+2GyuVXJS0DrJasmqFz6RLQcodrCW982pNVGA@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2wMNuPe5mmjDx5xG+3GmN-k47gsabiMQX56fiT+Kk-QcA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2AJ4+cvPk-XDzuxehCP+Pw-nUngxhaVMYwUvQJDK8ExA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqfb-8SBc0_f+tBfSST7-StQp_ug27r=ntRAmfjPwj=rmA@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2wHGNhbC9+Zg3DDO_FCNxY5JxJoe2i0PK1yjF4=JgrGnA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1U8MtHQcoRK7dStF9mkmcnHfN2e7qdm1LVPigKzhaQWg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPK2Dew++U+TsP6D1+Q8xxb6dPOxyO5+7GZd5c1NUd074VMX-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPK2DewF5KUwzsH2Mfaohdcz3e3=G3GeFHNdw-h=myJtzzdmoA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqf3MK0YU-=dVR0nL7mgic4nE9BARp5=0hGne0M++045iw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPK2Dew9yMhbubP3JnuoT-VtAffwG9ZE_k+arupBaHwWetp9KA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 10:43:13 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: GtAb2wUQjE4te_wq8tGJKHd3gAU
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqdZ54W=AosT0K3thy6K5NwKGvV4qq=3YkVc2Gwc7uEG0w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 6MAN WG Adoption call : draft-jeong-6man-rdnss-rfc6106-bis
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
To: "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/tAZSsT62WNEkg81H-frsBbTnNEs>
Cc: 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 17:43:15 -0000

At Wed, 7 Oct 2015 09:32:53 +0900,
"Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think your revised text for the note looks good to me.
> One thing to modify is the term of link indices and link zone indices.
> I believe that one unified term such as link zone indices will be better as
> follows:
>
>  Note:  The addresses for recursive DNS servers in the RDNSS option
>        MAY be link-local addresses.  Such link-local addresses SHOULD be
>        registered into the resolver repository along with the
>        corresponding link zone indices of the links that receive the RDNSS
>        option(s) for them.  The link zone indices SHOULD
>        be represented in the textual format for scoped addresses as
>        described in [RFC4007].  When a resolver sends a DNS query message
>        to an RDNSS with a link-local address, it MUST use the
>        corresponding link.
>
> If it is okay, I will revise the draft to reflect this change.

Works for me.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email