IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON as a WG Item in the Charter

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Sat, 15 March 2014 06:12 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8961A0051 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 23:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.362
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.362 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MWD-zvv8RuUN for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 23:12:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24C21A0035 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 23:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id s2F6Cek5022685; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 15:12:40 +0900
Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.134]) by scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 7126_7a7c_d026f948_ac08_11e3_83c9_001e6722eec2; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 15:12:40 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [133.2.210.1]) by itmail2.it.aoyama.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC10ABF4CC; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 15:12:39 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <5323EF4E.3040603@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 15:12:30 +0900
From: "\"Martin J. Dürst\"" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com>, IETF JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
References: <53238F21.2030508@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <53238F21.2030508@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/D0IcJUuqUXLAPlxB7MqVAsWFFII
Subject: Re: [Json] Call for WG Consensus to Adopt I-JSON as a WG Item in the Charter
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 06:12:57 -0000

On 2014/03/15 08:22, Matt Miller wrote:
> The chairs are seeking comment on whether we should adopt I-JSON
> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bray-i-json-01) as a WG item in our
> charter. Remember that adopting this draft does not mean it is done;
> changes can happen based on the consensus of the WG.

> Please speak up whether or not you believe our charter should be amended
> to include this work item.

Okay with me.

> Note that the current draft does *not* have the new MIME type nor the
> reserved field name that was heavily debated in London; that could be
> added later if there is WG consensus to do so.

It's great that these are gone, and they shouldn't come back.

Regards,    Martin.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email