Re: [Json] REMINDER - WGLC Ends 2013-10-11

Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Fri, 11 October 2013 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4705511E8191 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.878
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.878 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.721, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fKpySsFNkeVh for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE8111E8174 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from netb.Speedport_W_700V ([91.35.4.98]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MEKZg-1VWv481fho-00FUPY for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 23:28:44 +0200
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: "Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 23:28:47 +0200
Message-ID: <o1rg59th73ddjmf564581vl19n0gd7j0c5@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <BF7E36B9C495A6468E8EC573603ED9411EF4E2DB@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com> <078c01cec6c5$d19fc990$74df5cb0$@augustcellars.com>
In-Reply-To: <078c01cec6c5$d19fc990$74df5cb0$@augustcellars.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:2gwIVYkFmFaycbX81zQGGIDJFSPTsJlo0S+huctnhhl99tHx89D eJ/EvtmxQ+EYwSTmmYoqI2WaM+euFa+WzrESB0T0IJvR1qoDKLAY41MF2dTUIwdPYtzzUZm OplE5lQ6momLXsyNo2h+I7tOFa7mYgDdLZeFkOwlXsut1njzsiKUR7BTNBX8q/4qjWZhmND eOtr1CK9vDgF0psT8L+Qw==
Cc: 'JSON WG' <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] REMINDER - WGLC Ends 2013-10-11
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 21:28:51 -0000

* Jim Schaad wrote:
>4.  The following is technically a change in the grammar, however is there a
>reason why an integer cannot be 00, but 1E00 is legal?  Do we want to change
>the definition of the exponent so that it matches that of integer?

In ecmascript a leading zero indicates an octal numeric literal. That
does not affect `00`, but `010 === 8` which is confusing and there is
no need for octal numbers in JSON. `1E00` is unambiguously decimal.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/