Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09

[Alvaro Retana <[e-mail]>]

LGTM! :-)

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On January 13, 2023 at 2:55:06 AM, [e-mail] (
[e-mail]) wrote:

Hi Alvaro,

Thanks for the follow-up.

> I've looked at your replies and the diffs using the version -
> 10. I still have a couple of comments in-line -- mostly about the
> instructions to the designated experts.

What is really key is that DEs motivate their decision and work with
requesters to make a request successful. DEs usually consult with each
other, but I don't need to we need to have this in the text.

Below an updated DE text to reflect some of your comments.

NEW:

The policy for allocating new bits from this sub-registry is
Specification Required (Section 4.6 of [RFC8126]).

Review requests are evaluated on the advice of one or more designated
experts.
Criteria that should be applied by the designated experts include
determining whether the proposed registration duplicates existing
entries and whether the registration description is sufficiently detailed
and fits
the purpose of this registry. These criteria are considered in
addition to those already provided in Section 4.6 of [RFC8126] (e.g.,
the proposed registration must be documented in a permanent and
readily available public specification). The designated
experts will either approve or deny the registration request,
communicating this decision to IANA. Denials should include an
explanation and, if applicable, suggestions as to how to make the
request successful.

Cheers,
Med