IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Tue, 26 April 2022 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A666C07061D for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 07:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 086Kc7gPSN9S for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 07:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AF57C14F74A for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 07:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id ay11-20020a05600c1e0b00b0038eb92fa965so1569460wmb.4 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 07:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=jz+x1isPjYvEWBl7hgrg4tZsro5wG88PyRUAVioF7Og=; b=BCMm4aLH3tNSopGSswoD9CFp7H3CrS67v3PmpyjopB7vtuyXYLyj2ruETR+UfMRRGG G3Tu5gjoFUSiys+owEFEOmM1TgczrWE5+Sdo1iHM0NMEvqFl65mjK2YWZjK3hpHIEZkJ sg8pjlWy6VGHY720hDoUldylt7+hyIWSIb7MPyZZBJz2do9fMyVdTCpR5ZsgJ4St5eKu KhApnfTRWyWKBuqtz2zODAm5e5nqv/JoRq0VnvSeHaRHemlPBP8lA7Chqmp+uAi9B6re 2Cl7wt5rdmIMusQkqKnkH+5BREvzUlsVCuH2uIMBQUypS9ZPpSRKB4E/93aZ1gI3Zre3 KLYQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=jz+x1isPjYvEWBl7hgrg4tZsro5wG88PyRUAVioF7Og=; b=wt+jtiXm9OaNcAFaYOp1RMOjk30eNZdDSZtnEYA/vY8Pr1L97jJtX7uQIJDuvgVbcX gZLTN2MLVtc5haN1qqAveRIhV1ONcEHU+B0/uM+hKySadyCFiloHA8tLXETWe6M53dUy jg/bWhbwIdRN7Tx1uc+DoCBBsI+JYZRD6UpclgH0EN5ue+p0jAvkpUsH3NlqRa32Gm0k PWqMo7Him03EJv33iLoOh4yp1/fEfqv+EDlk03mCQZsmFNGq9b3805wM6u9FyQbNZWH5 AyKXpSItOI040XY6mpRAo7MHdViZhBMQ/eUM2r5uO0g628h+Tp0ksgBR57loKBM5FmKD AsLw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533V4oBLVCjijp9CPkRymD2lI3kZadlcQcOqy+EcKFv7aMquYNG9 MFTuPhg5gMsSOHn3r5jjl91Fig==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQ7QIn6n7afQLjvyzRmw7vMwRz6n2UEl+JjoXRE+JPNvFQQb9BBzgyI+lUXdijjojbV8fY7w==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:35c6:b0:393:ebf0:d530 with SMTP id r6-20020a05600c35c600b00393ebf0d530mr9881816wmq.34.1650981726298; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 07:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2a01:e0a:1ec:470:3d7d:7cbb:b80b:d979]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i11-20020a5d584b000000b0020a8d859e5fsm12204645wrf.10.2022.04.26.07.02.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Apr 2022 07:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Message-Id: <5CA64842-71CE-46AD-94AC-BC23088022BC@gigix.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8BBA01E6-A83E-449D-9EE5-B3FE68628980"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.80.82.1.1\))
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 16:02:04 +0200
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB35915DD60736C6665AA2846FB6FB9@BYAPR11MB3591.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub@ietf.org>, "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>, "lisp-chairs@ietf.org" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org>
To: "Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)" <natal@cisco.com>
References: <CAMMESsyB6WXxZP-CxQ6xzYQ6rRC86TQPT+PDqc3+qvR364qdCw@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR11MB3591AEB4FEE1EFDEEE5F8908B6FB9@BYAPR11MB3591.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESszb=tctaAhnjvx0cc4iT8MXiMxhg+ygcNDnC+DwHu70Jw@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR11MB35915DD60736C6665AA2846FB6FB9@BYAPR11MB3591.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.80.82.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/XoNBuR9ebWZgxr2rjTs38tE7OE0>
Subject: Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 14:03:09 -0000

Hi Alberto,

Indeed the LISP WG Chair asked about this a while ago ;-)

Ciao

L.


> On 26 Apr 2022, at 15:37, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) <natal@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Sounds good Alvaro. We’re already collecting some deployment experience as per the chairs suggestion. We’ll send an updated draft to the list once ready.
>  
> Thanks!
> Aberto
>  
> From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:aretana.ietf@gmail.com>>
> Date: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 1:22 PM
> To: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) <natal@cisco.com <mailto:natal@cisco.com>>, draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub@ietf.org> <draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub@ietf.org>>
> Cc: lisp@ietf.org <mailto:lisp@ietf.org> <lisp@ietf.org <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>>, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net <mailto:ggx@gigix.net>>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:lisp-chairs@ietf.org> <lisp-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:lisp-chairs@ietf.org>>
> Subject: Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09
> 
> Alberto:
>  
> Hi!
>  
> I don’t have an objection with changing the status.  However, I would be interested in any deployment experience.
>  
> In any case, please make sure that a change is discussed on the mailing list — start a new thread so it doesn’t end up buried in this one.
>  
> Thanks!
>  
> Alvaro.
>  
> On April 26, 2022 at 6:02:23 AM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) (natal@cisco.com <mailto:natal@cisco.com>) wrote:
> 
> One quick reply regarding the intended status. As discussed in Vienna, it seems that this one could be moved into Standards Track. The plan for the next iteration is to update the intended status to Proposed Standard.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email