Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09
Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Tue, 26 April 2022 11:15 UTC
Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D01C14F73A for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 04:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bQwi16Jy63-X for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 04:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B89D3C14F74F for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 04:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id x17so31310975lfa.10 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 04:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uHe5j4Kly/ijiVpQkLbNlD1wJ2mv2rrB3d34TF+9ELU=; b=OTojv5JJtaLZ7096RB46XSF6AQh8TygLpMvohVXvf8koVmsH4WIlm+wqR7nAh6TrRC rO/afDEu/rt3cnOSFVqWSAqwp27PbX0lRTfntqMj0yM3BvyOSNG+rFsWIuPaisgqJxr2 zMbVDCRky/kqirp8MJMkP24828VRdWjkd/cwkqezqQfk8zEll1ewv9UYmyj246dfwhcR mW3g9dAewlfOJZ3h/dP/IfJXfnL2o4VGjVTmcfNUitkFD+Q6CjvhP3kQvp8xtTLq5MW/ Hcu+atCUw1LAeRrgJbrWeWaSOQG3zgpcsIQySKd6kGsyPmt0tMIm+HS0xgzKXtZKN8JW 9sNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uHe5j4Kly/ijiVpQkLbNlD1wJ2mv2rrB3d34TF+9ELU=; b=Gq8lA8FWXOPRoCTyoEse6ASVNMFAQ0e1ax+xmY/D3l1glRPnUJXSuf4WWz5nRuH/PK HogPvgdDAQXTljAyK2gcVeB3d2zsQ9DftqSRNXcYBUzuAIXGWIV+PhZ9G3qI/lDjQE0B yQBYiys/q/sWiU77yunfCZXH5hi0UspHnlYNIS6hnODdPyOQQfSMi+fevW7kAtCpRAw+ XxHzUBAcdfMtbrW9qKt6E+QiG4tWFRT6z2AlM8/A69BT8OCm6xBt0am2bur42B2zWpYi ZU5jw/2WSgsvj36EwwKpyXv7ZJ+WxZytGQ3voAmJlXgkUwBTLKRzyrR3/3Txou8NhDP8 kSDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5300QgaV4e6ivijOlWniZNYlUVzy05+0o8CB00QePrx2KMImFqt/ 3YFeGG0y1tKd+xqYIfyE6GRiFoIsOQHwjp539GkpFw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy4JdCCmARO5zb3PiJR+iLDceWgBnsO5rZEvitCg9SrYdf4nABbjqVjNRh707iBSWm1KuDewLcRwzgCpvpY08U=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:685:b0:471:d466:9750 with SMTP id t5-20020a056512068500b00471d4669750mr15959534lfe.623.1650971696515; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 04:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMMESsyB6WXxZP-CxQ6xzYQ6rRC86TQPT+PDqc3+qvR364qdCw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMHj-kUJry65zprwv+QxDRJ8LCM73MRfG8MEBNFtniLoxg@mail.gmail.com> <19001_1650971119_6267D1EF_19001_36_1_dfa55c0666fc4d3aa735649f52d72f66@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <19001_1650971119_6267D1EF_19001_36_1_dfa55c0666fc4d3aa735649f52d72f66@orange.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 13:14:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMGjSEn2-_1ik=LQN1Y1yy0BSXmZgPSKh5nSm9Zo48A8Lw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "mohamed.boucadair" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub@ietf.org>, "lisp-chairs@ietf.org" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008168fb05dd8ccdd4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/LVixt7v_lqUwU3sSpGGLfv2Dly0>
Subject: Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 11:15:02 -0000
Hi, The below is much broader and richer then what I had in mind, but would clearly solve it. I was just thinking on 2-4 octet integer (aka color) allowing for easy marking by originator then used for subscription. Thx, R. On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 1:05 PM <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote: > Hi Robert, all, > > > > We used to have something similar in one of the individual documents that > fed this spec: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-boucadair-lisp-subscribe: > > > > o Filter: This field carries a destination EID (or a set thereof) > > that is encoded as an UTF-8 string. This specification allows to > > convey IP prefix literals, Names and/or AS numbers. One or > > multiple filters may be present in a request. IPv4 prefixes are > > encoded as IPv4-mapped IPv6 prefixes [RFC4291 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4291>] (i.e., starting > > with ::ffff:0:0/96). A mix of names, IP prefixes and AS numbers > > may be enclosed in the same request. The value 0 is used to > > delete existing filters. Filters MUST be applied in the order > > they appear in the request. > > > > We don’t inherit that aspect in the pubsub I-D as the intent was to have > something that easily builds on existing specs. > > > > Cheers, > > Med > > > > *De :* lisp <lisp-bounces@ietf.org> *De la part de* Robert Raszuk > *Envoyé :* mardi 26 avril 2022 11:13 > *À :* lisp@ietf.org list <lisp@ietf.org> > *Cc :* draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub@ietf.org; lisp-chairs@ietf.org > *Objet :* [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 > > > > Hi, > > > > Noticed Alvaro's review and have one question related to the draft .. > > > > Is EID the only key to subscribe ? > > > > Do you have a notion of subscribing to a group of EIDs (EID prefix) with > one request ? Or is there a way to subscribe to a group of EIDs based on > some other form of marking/grouping/coloring of EIDs ? > > > > Thx, > R. > > > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > >
- [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alvaro Retana
- [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Robert Raszuk
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
- Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
- Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Robert Raszuk
- Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
- Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Robert Raszuk
- Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Robert Raszuk
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alvaro Retana
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alvaro Retana
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alvaro Retana
- Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alvaro Retana
- Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alvaro Retana
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alvaro Retana
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alvaro Retana
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alvaro Retana
- Re: [lisp] AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-09 Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)