Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

"Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole)" <mportole@cisco.com> Thu, 19 July 2018 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mportole@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2959130F16; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HaoQ88KeLrOY; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 250FE130EC8; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7026; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1532036155; x=1533245755; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=bBE2AoHe76mCelRTPRkAGlqMs02XugfBvD2yvYh+RGs=; b=EcbhdDTq73R7mJdFIKECkyWqEmTW8o0bBfmoFiIGYMuNE/TpWVm2twTF m6dELAx4PpponYEbh20srs8mYspsCX3VuXxIUPAzU7envS26Zy4XEdxNP oGeV7EWtxKHtzN2EVC6umIxRTbAj8qN2pKAeXHLBWOaRDU6fR8oDy84zL 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CwAAAVA1Fb/5pdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJXdmN/KAqDdIgEjDCCDJArhRAUgWYLI4RJAheCbiE0GAE?= =?us-ascii?q?CAQECAQECbRwMhTYBAQEBAx0GVhACAQgOAwMBAisCAgIwHQgCBAENBYMgAYE?= =?us-ascii?q?bZA+pfYEuhF2FbAWJAlWBQYE4gmqDGQEBA4EqAQ8CAgE+gmExgiQCmWgJAoY?= =?us-ascii?q?LiR+BRIQShn+BF4o/hzcCERSBJB04YXFwFTsqAYI+ixWFPm+KW4EaAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,376,1526342400"; d="scan'208,217";a="145660715"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jul 2018 21:35:54 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w6JLZraH001513 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 19 Jul 2018 21:35:54 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:35:53 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-011.cisco.com ([64.101.220.151]) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com ([64.101.220.151]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:35:53 -0400
From: "Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole)" <mportole@cisco.com>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
CC: "lisp-chairs@ietf.org" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf
Thread-Index: AQHUFREBoU5ib0xAdESkZhv4hS/XX6SW9IIA
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 21:35:53 +0000
Message-ID: <664A4380-2E20-464C-A825-3620A00901AC@cisco.com>
References: <264A0327-FBC2-4768-89DA-53BEE10AC6CF@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <264A0327-FBC2-4768-89DA-53BEE10AC6CF@gigix.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.e.1.180613
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.154.160.56]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_664A43802E20464CA8253620A00901ACciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.153, xch-rtp-013.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/IEfrrHj8cw1rFKsAmgH70rJax3Y>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 21:35:58 -0000

I also support handing this document to the AD

From: lisp <lisp-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Date: Friday, July 6, 2018 at 3:06 AM
To: "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
Cc: "lisp-chairs@ietf.org" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

Folks,

As Alberto mentioned in a previous mail, in London there was consensus to move forward draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-02] (after the few fixes that I asked).

Fixes are done, hence, this email starts the usual two weeks WG Last Call, to end July 20th, 2018.

Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is ready for handing to the AD.
If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.

Thanks

Luigi & Joel