IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Fri, 06 July 2018 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38868130EB9; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 11:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Mfi-Tav2yeB; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 11:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22d.google.com (mail-pf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 349A1130E97; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 11:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id q7-v6so7989319pff.2; Fri, 06 Jul 2018 11:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=qSGl9yRR5vtqWwmlMC7Pf2oiiy7uSZrzBr7rn1mTwqo=; b=aiwWlE79GCJ4P52l0CTArx1rZC/m/qBDyHsBC4U70Dm4b0H/Q5l3BMsMrCUsvCouLS H0wEIn5AqH/6UDUeUGovqklVo47nV7wqvNP2XiTqUprIRNfN4eOYBrRm2kSayxwTB0nq uttToVOIzVrg5y4GRD/+1UNQJ6+Li/BJW/JRGhEctoZHI3GFORl2+S/4/HwZG2m/HQzQ DWa2HdB89EHxhmll3nLq+pjSgYuPIFZrmfWs588tIQwdh+KzQG9mHvUQsQvXU5mzRnD5 APKjBkec7psF0Ta2oAEPNKtuQC2TsEg5r6voeGqdUJdasz+DfeL6NKrRfUywxWx+xHeP BYoA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=qSGl9yRR5vtqWwmlMC7Pf2oiiy7uSZrzBr7rn1mTwqo=; b=bjGgKzTbovHLzBXkwbppXDkrXyb6C2Fy9m7QhMYNMBApYsH70cf2Es6dJ+vLIg9iEi 7pgYkrLe1SAlnB7YWorbZBn0toADWXeIV6SWyXvWwrY4hzToaqG2gvdU4x0zGgy/vrlq lp8uM03eBaN8l1mw0gqjoXZtoLYEWpLBdaz9bkZiVTkilw+o1nIgmCv515EVMWFmkfpO +ykAOskk+l+r+q+4+XRpGehUtSwSwNA0J3+liqyRfsAttmPtsnIlEioluAjptfWvD6WN IniilYhQzWStEdmW3OaxIG21IQflPS6LRzdcgZojbrLZTPtZzNGPCi/a9JWnDpCKqNeF w3pg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0ow5hk7LWpwbJBLhQxghwB27KUzXyOSeZNpf1/QDHS9SMaBOgo rLOSUr+8ErU8g9PKl/WHrXE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpdzf4q7oVil4L6eN5uV7azzgs8PXlhK4+DyHhAbdf2NRFO8gGe7q2VwbVP94GzGZXfvXbA3tw==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:cc4d:: with SMTP id a74-v6mr11793469pfg.200.1530902347771; Fri, 06 Jul 2018 11:39:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.31.79.139] ([96.72.181.209]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s6-v6sm20877104pfs.115.2018.07.06.11.39.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Jul 2018 11:39:07 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <264A0327-FBC2-4768-89DA-53BEE10AC6CF@gigix.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 11:38:36 -0700
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AF959EB0-350B-4AF1-BEF8-D49D004282C5@gmail.com>
References: <264A0327-FBC2-4768-89DA-53BEE10AC6CF@gigix.net>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/hawRifsXXckCZDcWv0XGIn3uB5E>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 18:39:11 -0000

I agree that it is ready for handing to the AD.

Dino

> On Jul 6, 2018, at 3:06 AM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
> As Alberto mentioned in a previous mail, in London there was consensus to move forward draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-02] (after the few fixes that I asked).
> 
> Fixes are done, hence, this email starts the usual two weeks WG Last Call, to end July 20th, 2018.
> 
> Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is ready for handing to the AD.
> If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Luigi & Joel
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email