Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

Fabio Maino <fmaino@cisco.com> Wed, 18 July 2018 20:19 UTC

Return-Path: <fmaino@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04167131006 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cVFkoQlETsHS for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:19:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B110A130EC8 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:19:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3775; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1531945177; x=1533154777; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=DNi5NybwRZIcakilgw6ALfdUnt8FKsOHWuee6NVe8Zo=; b=TcgvCgljZMpmwZgGef13OTxOJTFOPswoVMEsbohJkcYzNRo3kuhIjUi7 9tvzzVzWN8N05mlT60QFQAhZppKCijBxUWooR4YrSIJu4f0JOQekBhNXO T0fjMw5bIueIImGAXxhpEAWOcxeZJetdkf9FgfLs6SR634IF0VqA1bE79 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CXAgCfn09b/5FdJa1cGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEIAQEBAYNJY38omC6BYCyQKoUPFIFmCxgBCoRJAoJ5ITYWAQIBAQIBAQJ?= =?us-ascii?q?tHAyFNwEBBAEBG1EbCwQULicwEwYCAQGDHAGBfw+rTR+EPIVqBYkCgVc/gTi?= =?us-ascii?q?CaoMZAQEDgSoBDwICAWuFCQKZYAmGCokXBoFEhBGCSIQygReKO4dcgUgDLmF?= =?us-ascii?q?xMxoIGxU7gmmLFYVaIzCNCgEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,371,1526342400"; d="scan'208,217";a="422565426"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Jul 2018 20:19:36 +0000
Received: from [10.82.240.100] (rtp-vpn2-100.cisco.com [10.82.240.100]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w6IKJaB5008144 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 20:19:36 GMT
To: lisp@ietf.org
References: <264A0327-FBC2-4768-89DA-53BEE10AC6CF@gigix.net>
From: Fabio Maino <fmaino@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <8bf7d49e-b3c8-b5b9-cac7-06190ab41252@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 16:19:36 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <264A0327-FBC2-4768-89DA-53BEE10AC6CF@gigix.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------C3E5C0DB255DA60BC4C22931"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/qEaV6C1tDno6n7U2ciW_pBkxD68>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 20:19:40 -0000

I support handing this document to the AD.

It's pretty straightforward, and I'm aware of implementations that plan 
to take advantage of this feature.

Fabio

On 7/6/18 6:06 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote:
> Folks,
>
> As Alberto mentioned in a previous mail, in London there was consensus 
> to move forward draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf 
> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-02] (after 
> the few fixes that I asked).
>
> Fixes are done, hence, this email starts the usual two weeks WG Last 
> Call, to end July 20th, 2018.
>
> Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that 
> it is ready for handing to the AD.
> If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain 
> what it would take to address your concerns.
>
> Thanks
>
> Luigi & Joel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp