Re: [lmap] What is broadband?

James Miller <jamesmilleresquire@gmail.com> Fri, 08 March 2013 02:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jamesmilleresquire@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D354C21F86B6 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 18:30:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CiGpU2+GGH32 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 18:30:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D9E21F86A8 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 18:30:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id hm14so679556wib.4 for <lmap@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 18:30:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=PKnR08YKybPfXYgSV9NfIBCiJrvhg3h2/BhSj2OFF8E=; b=c6+akOTfJ2yntRV9oLV24q2bJsWmAgueEU15tSkf8R85K5h7WxjZp8Pxv+9VnxJw2a qGHi3nZrNE9lwCGI0hnOibbVxR8ISZcuf2lK5RaJgeEZ+4FNmZnlQESW128P1bfVk2Fe HpEOHq0mCEvEY+5/+5kNrM8pCi9BsyhmNoD/DbKhP2fXRdel2hQrebLTA867FdxQikFX ekbsUlZ6sT/s/e8hgJh0ieM8KLPnqbTmdAS6JD3R/bVPQtyfdeWiRvVM2UXnROy5KJi9 W1Dy7uTTA6/HWseqF0IqvvvXN1/O9p/OlW4sbBUcnXMsyOqemRMWsYKvlsX0nKhFQ//1 CJxw==
X-Received: by 10.180.87.170 with SMTP id az10mr893625wib.3.1362709855435; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 18:30:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.24.10 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 18:30:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <C6E1FAB2-526A-407D-B69C-359E60528A14@centurylink.com>
References: <51387034.2040708@cisco.com> <E1565840-E564-439D-85B9-990878BD7DF4@castlepoint.net> <C6E1FAB2-526A-407D-B69C-359E60528A14@centurylink.com>
From: James Miller <jamesmilleresquire@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 21:30:25 -0500
Message-ID: <CANFMejiN=64jTvSAhY0_q91B4PqhJ7PZPPSbOsGNKMbk3=spQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Bugenhagen, Michael K" <Michael.K.Bugenhagen@centurylink.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d0444e97fdd83a004d7609cd7"
Cc: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Shane Amante <shane@castlepoint.net>, "lmap@ietf.org" <lmap@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lmap] What is broadband?
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lmap>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 02:30:58 -0000

I believe that Henning had commented at some point that the LMAP definition
he contemplated had "architecture" as the 'A' element but certainly access
is an important piece.  I think one of the problems that has been discussed
also on the LMAP and our FCC Next-Gen lists is that a complete view of LMAP
performance measurements would implicate elements from the user's laptop,
through wireless and other local LAN, carriers access networks, Tier 1 and
other peering networks, the application host side and everything in
between.  Clearly there would be a lot of technologies included within
that functional scope.

For reference, in the FCC Measuring Broadband America Program we focused on
measurement from the consumers' broadband modem through the carriers
network to where it connects to a tier one peering point.  LMAP should be
able to address the broad mix of other use cases that would have a mix of
other elements and motivations.

Graphic in Report at page 9.
http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/measuringbroadbandreport/2Methodology.pdf

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Bugenhagen, Michael K <
Michael.K.Bugenhagen@centurylink.com> wrote:

>  The word "access" should be key here as part of the definition provided
> we are talking about an Internet service, which is the second component.
> I don't really  think we are building tests that won't work on smaller
> pipes so questioning if it really 'broadband' or not is correct IMO.
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 7, 2013, at 9:41 AM, "Shane Amante" <shane@castlepoint.net> wrote:
>
>  Benoit,
>
>  On Mar 7, 2013, at 3:47 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I started to review the drafts, and I will start posting a few questions
> to the list.
> Open questions, clarifying questions, in order to generate some
> discussions.
> Disclaimer: I have not yet read the entire list archive. Apologize in
> advance if some points have been discussed already.
>
> Here is my first question. What is broadband in the LMAP context?
> Is it DSL, cable, ETTH, Fiber to the home?  Is LMAP technology independent?
> And I see also "enterprise edge router", "cellular data or satellite" in
> draft-schulzrinne-lmap-requirements. In or out?
> Or do we have in mind a phase approach, starting with the "enterprise edge
> router" first, and then home network?
>
>
>  Speaking for the network I operate, I'm very much an advocate of saying
> that "Enterprise Edge Router" is "in-scope".  We would very much benefit
> from a standards-based measurement enablement and collection regime vs.
> mostly proprietary, and non-scalable, approaches that exist today.
>
>  This is not to diminish the importance of similar test capabilities for
> residential broadband use-cases.  We absolutely need to work on those, as
> well.
>
>  With respect to priority, my hope is that we do not have to choose to
> prioritize one over the other.  Rather, I would hope that both can be
> developed in parallel, because both -- at least, IMO -- have a
> substantially overlapping set of requirements/features.
>
>  My $0.02,
>
>  -shane
>
>
>  Interestingly, I don't know what A stands for in LMAP, if it stands for
> something.
> According to http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/WikiStart, the A
> doesn't stand for anything.
> However, looking at the different draft titles, there is some confusion.
>
>    draft-linsner-lmap-use-cases-0 title is Large-Scale Broadband Measurement Use Cases
>    draft-schulzrinne-lmap-requirements-00.txt title is Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband Performance
>    draft-boucadair-lmap-considerations-00, *Large scale Measurement of **Access **network Performance (LMAP)*:
>       Requirements and Issues from a Network Provider Perspective
>
>
> Some more discussions, on the mailing list or during the BoF, on this
> topic would be appreciated.
>
> Regards, Benoit
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> lmap mailing list
> lmap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap
>
>
>   _______________________________________________
> lmap mailing list
> lmap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lmap mailing list
> lmap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap
>
>