Re: [lmap] What is broadband?

<philip.eardley@bt.com> Sun, 10 March 2013 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <philip.eardley@bt.com>
X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321BB11E80F0 for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.215
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.215 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.383, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GiNC0gfVyrdg for <lmap@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpe1.intersmtp.com (smtp62.intersmtp.com [62.239.224.235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0A111E80EF for <lmap@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EVMHT61-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net (10.36.3.127) by RDW083A006ED62.smtp-e2.hygiene.service (10.187.98.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.297.1; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:56:28 +0000
Received: from EMV65-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net ([169.254.1.43]) by EVMHT61-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net ([10.36.3.127]) with mapi; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:56:28 +0000
From: philip.eardley@bt.com
To: jamesmilleresquire@gmail.com, Michael.K.Bugenhagen@centurylink.com
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:56:28 +0000
Thread-Topic: [lmap] What is broadband?
Thread-Index: Ac4bpPleAa9K0F5yQlaNHYoyH8oECQCIiOlF
Message-ID: <9510D26531EF184D9017DF24659BB87F343774C51B@EMV65-UKRD.domain1.systemhost.net>
References: <51387034.2040708@cisco.com> <E1565840-E564-439D-85B9-990878BD7DF4@castlepoint.net> <C6E1FAB2-526A-407D-B69C-359E60528A14@centurylink.com>, <CANFMejiN=64jTvSAhY0_q91B4PqhJ7PZPPSbOsGNKMbk3=spQw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANFMejiN=64jTvSAhY0_q91B4PqhJ7PZPPSbOsGNKMbk3=spQw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9510D26531EF184D9017DF24659BB87F343774C51BEMV65UKRDdoma_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: bclaise@cisco.com, shane@castlepoint.net, lmap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lmap] What is broadband?
X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance <lmap.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lmap>
List-Post: <mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap>, <mailto:lmap-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:56:42 -0000

the 'A' in lmap doesnt stand for anything (somewhere lost in the mists of history... it didnt seem sensible to change the abbreviation before the BoF, since people have got used to the term)

consumer and enterprise wired broadband certainly of interest to me. that includes the network beyond the access (BRAS, peering point etc).  so a "registry" of reference points in the network seems like work that needs to be done [tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morton-ippm-lmap-path as first attempt]

phil

________________________________
From: lmap-bounces@ietf.org [lmap-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Miller [jamesmilleresquire@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 March 2013 02:30
To: Bugenhagen, Michael K
Cc: Benoit Claise; Shane Amante; lmap@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lmap] What is broadband?

I believe that Henning had commented at some point that the LMAP definition he contemplated had "architecture" as the 'A' element but certainly access is an important piece.  I think one of the problems that has been discussed also on the LMAP and our FCC Next-Gen lists is that a complete view of LMAP performance measurements would implicate elements from the user's laptop, through wireless and other local LAN, carriers access networks, Tier 1 and other peering networks, the application host side and everything in between.  Clearly there would be a lot of technologies included within that functional scope.

For reference, in the FCC Measuring Broadband America Program we focused on measurement from the consumers' broadband modem through the carriers network to where it connects to a tier one peering point.  LMAP should be able to address the broad mix of other use cases that would have a mix of other elements and motivations.

Graphic in Report at page 9. http://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/measuringbroadbandreport/2Methodology.pdf

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Bugenhagen, Michael K <Michael.K.Bugenhagen@centurylink.com<mailto:Michael.K.Bugenhagen@centurylink.com>> wrote:
The word "access" should be key here as part of the definition provided we are talking about an Internet service, which is the second component.   I don't really  think we are building tests that won't work on smaller pipes so questioning if it really 'broadband' or not is correct IMO.



Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 7, 2013, at 9:41 AM, "Shane Amante" <shane@castlepoint.net<mailto:shane@castlepoint.net>> wrote:

Benoit,

On Mar 7, 2013, at 3:47 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com<mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>> wrote:
Dear all,

I started to review the drafts, and I will start posting a few questions to the list.
Open questions, clarifying questions, in order to generate some discussions.
Disclaimer: I have not yet read the entire list archive. Apologize in advance if some points have been discussed already.

Here is my first question. What is broadband in the LMAP context?
Is it DSL, cable, ETTH, Fiber to the home?  Is LMAP technology independent?
And I see also "enterprise edge router", "cellular data or satellite" in draft-schulzrinne-lmap-requirements. In or out?
Or do we have in mind a phase approach, starting with the "enterprise edge router" first, and then home network?

Speaking for the network I operate, I'm very much an advocate of saying that "Enterprise Edge Router" is "in-scope".  We would very much benefit from a standards-based measurement enablement and collection regime vs. mostly proprietary, and non-scalable, approaches that exist today.

This is not to diminish the importance of similar test capabilities for residential broadband use-cases.  We absolutely need to work on those, as well.

With respect to priority, my hope is that we do not have to choose to prioritize one over the other.  Rather, I would hope that both can be developed in parallel, because both -- at least, IMO -- have a substantially overlapping set of requirements/features.

My $0.02,

-shane


Interestingly, I don't know what A stands for in LMAP, if it stands for something.
According to http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/WikiStart, the A doesn't stand for anything.
However, looking at the different draft titles, there is some confusion.

   draft-linsner-lmap-use-cases-0 title is Large-Scale Broadband Measurement Use Cases
   draft-schulzrinne-lmap-requirements-00.txt title is Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband Performance
   draft-boucadair-lmap-considerations-00, Large scale Measurement of Access network Performance (LMAP):
      Requirements and Issues from a Network Provider Perspective

Some more discussions, on the mailing list or during the BoF, on this topic would be appreciated.

Regards, Benoit



_______________________________________________
lmap mailing list
lmap@ietf.org<mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap

_______________________________________________
lmap mailing list
lmap@ietf.org<mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap

_______________________________________________
lmap mailing list
lmap@ietf.org<mailto:lmap@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap