Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next steps

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 25 July 2019 04:56 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: loops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: loops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9611201E2 for <loops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 21:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sNbue90HqYSd for <loops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 21:56:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBBD51201C5 for <loops@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 21:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-9abf.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-9abf.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.154.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45vKgR5N4bzykm; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 06:56:35 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAPjWiCSbPioTHkYBpX73qxzO=H1sJDZpCMCKzBKoU4rZLLhwMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:56:33 -0400
Cc: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, loops@ietf.org, Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 585723392.010839-c9494d8d4024ec7ab14e6d0d9e068dcd
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E6659E42-D6D7-4033-B4D6-9305823063D2@tzi.org>
References: <CAKKJt-eRGJe+9PtEC7xgFz+HA0zsr_sR0NUgKRmJ-P5Q3XBg-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPjWiCSbPioTHkYBpX73qxzO=H1sJDZpCMCKzBKoU4rZLLhwMQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/loops/6kTziJYVaYFxXS_vqfu0OTG9Pj8>
Subject: Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next steps
X-BeenThere: loops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Local Optimizations on Path Segments <loops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/loops>, <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/loops/>
List-Post: <mailto:loops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/loops>, <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 04:56:40 -0000

On Jul 24, 2019, at 18:17, Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com> wrote:
> 
> Standardisation of what? The architecture? The protocols (beware there is already FECFRAME and others)? The proxies?

Hi Marie-José,

details of the thinking that was developed in the side meetings that happened at the previous two IETF meetings can be found at

https://github.com/loops-wg/charter

The BOF actually added one piece of information I didn’t previously perceive that way:
People seem to really want to tackle the host-to-node case (as needed, e.g., for going through WiFi access clouds) right away, not just the in-network (node-to-node) case.  That would be the one thing I would change based on my recollection of the BOF.  But of course there may be other things; it may be worth to now have another round of discussion of the proposed charter.

Grüße, Carsten