IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next steps

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 25 July 2019 19:10 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: loops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: loops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69321201B0 for <loops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uLrXRu-JqUbA for <loops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:10:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B018A1201A0 for <loops@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:10:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-80d9.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-80d9.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.128.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45vhcs38Ftz1096; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 21:10:37 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-c24RdPyZRoK-B6fXuN0xABUsU=p7Y6UFwAcENfjE3oOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:10:34 -0400
Cc: Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, loops@ietf.org, Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 585774632.598539-70d365e0ba5733283864bb0664b80b71
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5A453FDB-79D2-4E70-A384-AEDC82547FF8@tzi.org>
References: <CAKKJt-eRGJe+9PtEC7xgFz+HA0zsr_sR0NUgKRmJ-P5Q3XBg-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPjWiCSbPioTHkYBpX73qxzO=H1sJDZpCMCKzBKoU4rZLLhwMQ@mail.gmail.com> <E6659E42-D6D7-4033-B4D6-9305823063D2@tzi.org> <CAKKJt-c24RdPyZRoK-B6fXuN0xABUsU=p7Y6UFwAcENfjE3oOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/loops/Ze-LIC0TO7waBBmSxjwLAq5vkbw>
Subject: Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next steps
X-BeenThere: loops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Local Optimizations on Path Segments <loops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/loops>, <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/loops/>
List-Post: <mailto:loops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/loops>, <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 19:10:43 -0000

On Jul 25, 2019, at 14:59, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> […] If the LOOPS community can’t live without host-to-node, the community should add it. If the community can make use of LOOPS without host-to-node and add it later, the community might consider whether that reduces the scope of the initial proposed charter enough to help Magnus approve it :-) 

Right.  One other place where we can structure the milestones further is by starting with retransmission mode only and add FEC mode in a second step.

So this would give us a nice and small first deliverable (retransmission mode for node-to-node) that we can then recharter from.  If we do this right, this doesn’t even need to increase the time up to when we deliver the whole protocol including both host-to-node and FEC.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email