Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next steps
Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com> Wed, 31 July 2019 23:28 UTC
Return-Path: <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
X-Original-To: loops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: loops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A6F120105 for <loops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mjmontpetit-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 787V3ZQetuNG for <loops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2e.google.com (mail-io1-xd2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9384E1200B5 for <loops@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2e.google.com with SMTP id j6so20361916ioa.5 for <loops@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mjmontpetit-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vohNMMoETPqenNm2LO57QhS95jCY1DBwIhiCIAVdKaE=; b=j6MrUh6uHEwiX22BJPm7zcoopgVlKGY38FLXteqXqsOeJNUvlmGonQzlAXqvugexq6 2BaTY7eVKo+nxXaI7BehYli66SOB0/qAaMMmg7uawMjFeLy/Oa18QdrHJeAsbdoa+Un+ IZvHfZVr55VglGDDHYkGeXNy+Gc3ako/xW1d2LgXWKeeRoSwagUwrjDpBlUPihpW3N81 22QPiiUHD9NJ1c0G9TQt9XzwbB54rk5It4Me8+gpWSJ/wYDrOW23wOLfboyyVXH/lBn0 pCIQR9LlgUUXhT1SR1tSozdfDTpm9w2vleXHLCHyKFrdZoBhyv3FPr+YeL4w4tqvwAmP xKNw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vohNMMoETPqenNm2LO57QhS95jCY1DBwIhiCIAVdKaE=; b=EGN/wyC6YHLM0thtv1UPJc+JJYgbRDq65FKAuR5GDr2qFcgpqtxv3liXVOuLK6oSQf r3jjHzbuYMvXnK594CLie5mRyzZbPZo8COvJzd77oJgtpteE/iaCCuB87dbbEqNu7pxS Jt2gzyhr2mG80Gw3d9amrIb8tAbrWOv5Na3kEil93h20Q4CzOvoaxX0a6clRbuWFx+bu xTLeILBDVrwAN9zDWW5IxCc7IC8FC3qEAN8TILVkPPWMErfjTcTfhBSSkzd3NRRR6DbS HfsExdif/Tn2fJaRGXZzBuVV7/b5ZCEoJaig0mxNiduU+ggm4w0mrGz6qND6UXBG+/Tb UkZw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUW6LaUs5JKFfFZRaV18gNA9oLCTBRLkA+U+IemOBA10CCD7ZJL Ew9VIlaCLWqgfyZC8ag7aB8oKjpTZ4+GEDykSSxIEIJR
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzCRD+oqeRjx8bEFOEcbZGiio7ZDuRoZEZ5IUkik8hK9VQMTKVNjL1pPR9n2gJfcu6hKVZ4E+cVTOpUarSCvKQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:6e01:: with SMTP id d1mr40151312ioh.156.1564615685718; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 18:28:04 -0500
From: Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
In-Reply-To: <7C016290-2FB9-4DCF-9213-749B2B27D4D0@tzi.org>
References: <CAKKJt-eRGJe+9PtEC7xgFz+HA0zsr_sR0NUgKRmJ-P5Q3XBg-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPjWiCSbPioTHkYBpX73qxzO=H1sJDZpCMCKzBKoU4rZLLhwMQ@mail.gmail.com> <E6659E42-D6D7-4033-B4D6-9305823063D2@tzi.org> <CAKKJt-c24RdPyZRoK-B6fXuN0xABUsU=p7Y6UFwAcENfjE3oOQ@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330312ECCEB@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAPjWiCTo+TjgJ97TTyY3yF=9BAiEyqnyDNbaHjXdqzW5h3JjAw@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330312ECFCF@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAPjWiCQpZ_60XO8+5dFC4Gp8Jh=bjpQSOnVE85LZi=OtjwP=Uw@mail.gmail.com> <EDE4C911-86A2-4347-B623-4B0CEF26C5D4@ifi.uio.no> <7C016290-2FB9-4DCF-9213-749B2B27D4D0@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 18:28:04 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPjWiCRXs72=tDBmNyrnB0yXFB8H0pYqUZNjV2f5TWyeXLkQGw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: "loops@ietf.org" <loops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000285f89058f027afa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/loops/h6PhLVONVDSqa-VdjZTusfgNFQs>
Subject: Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next steps
X-BeenThere: loops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Local Optimizations on Path Segments <loops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/loops>, <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/loops/>
List-Post: <mailto:loops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/loops>, <mailto:loops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 23:28:08 -0000
Actually in FEC you do not process every packet. In what is called “systematic mode” you send all the packets in the buffer (window) followed by the coded packet(s). If everything goes well you never process anything. And if something is lost then you use the recovery packets. mjm Marie-José Montpetit, Ph.D. Research Affiliate, MIT Media Laboratory mariejose@mjmontpetit.com mariejo@mit.edu On July 31, 2019 at 7:11:41 PM, Carsten Bormann (cabo@tzi.org) wrote: On Aug 1, 2019, at 00:18, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> wrote: > > if the packet loss ratio is known Conversely, retransmission can be better to handle random, bursty losses. (For a definition of “better”, which may depend on your needs.) But more importantly, for retransmission, the ingress node needs to store copies of packets for a while (and retransmit from this cache), and the egress node needs to send ACKs. This is much less work per packet than doing FEC, which needs processing of the contents of each packet. So nodes may be able to do retransmission LOOPS at a higher rate than they would be able to do FEC LOOPS. Grüße, Carsten -- LOOPS mailing list LOOPS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/loops
- [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next steps Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Michael Welzl
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Liyizhou
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Emmanuel Lochin
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Wesley Eddy
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Wesley Eddy
- Re: [LOOPS] [nwcrg] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOO… Stuart William Card
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Michael Welzl
- Re: [LOOPS] [nwcrg] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOO… Colin Perkins
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Wesley Eddy
- Re: [LOOPS] [nwcrg] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOO… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [LOOPS] [nwcrg] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOO… Colin Perkins
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Michael Welzl
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Colin Perkins
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Colin Perkins
- Re: [LOOPS] BOF co-chairs thinking on LOOPS next … Marie-Jose Montpetit